AKIL KURESHI, M.S.SANKLECHA
Pushkar Prabhat Chandra Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Akil Kureshi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties for final disposal of the petition.
2. Petitioner has challenged a notice dated 5th February, 2018 issued by the respondent No. 2 Income Tax Officer under section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short). The petitioner has further prayed for refund of a sum of Rs. 3,67,600/ already recovered from the petitioner and to permanently restrain the respondents from recovering balance amount of Rs. 6,69,250/for which a further notice dated 10th September, 2018 was issued by the respondent No. 2.
3. Brief facts are as under :
Petitioner is an individual. The petitioner had sold an immovable property under a deed dated 23rd November, 2015 to Mr. and Mrs. Bhanpurwala for total consideration of Rs. 9 crores. The purchasers of the said property had made a net payment of Rs. 8 crores 91 lakhs to the petitioner after deducting tax at source at 1% of the payment in terms of section 194 IA of the Act.
4. The petitioner filed the return of income for the assessment year 2016-17 on 12th October, 2017 declaring total income of Rs. 2,28,62,110/. In such return of income electronically filed by the petitioner, he had clai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.