JUDGMENT

S.V. Gangapurwala, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final disposal at admission stage.

2. The respondents issued composite tender calling upon the prospective contractors for execution of different K.T. Weirs, Khadakwadi, Waranwadi, Taluka Parner, District Ahmednagar.

3. Seven tenderers participated in the process. Upon opening the technical bid, six including petitioner were disqualified. Respondent no. 5 was held to be qualified in the technical bid. The petitioner assails its disqualification and also the act of the respondents - authorities declaring respondent no. 5 as technically qualified.

4. Under order dated 19.9.2019, we had directed that if the work order is not issued, the same shall not be issued till next date.

5. It is submitted that the work order is issued to respondent no. 5 on 9.9.2019. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner the work order alleged to have been issued to respondent no. 5 is not yet uploaded on website. The learned A.G.P., on instructions of the Officer present in the Court accepts that the issuance of work order to respondent no. 5 is not yet uploaded on the web