SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Bom) 654

N.B.SURYAWANSHI
Rameshchandra – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Village Panchayat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : G.G. Bade, Adv.
For the Respondent: V.P. Maldhure, A.G.P.

JUDGMENT :

N.B. Suryawanshi, J.

1. Heard.

The petitioner challenges the order passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Murtizapur below Exh. 1 in M.C.C. No. 318 of 2016, filed by the petitioner under Section 13(3) of the Births and Death Registration Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as "the Said Act" for short). It was contended by the petitioner that he is resident of Mouza: Mana, Tahsil: Murtizapur, District: Akola since his birth and his birth date is 06/07/1960. Though his birth took place at the residential house at village Mana, inadvertently birth of the petitioner was not registered in the Gram Panchayat record. He claimed that birth needs to be registered considering his future prospects. He further contended that he applied for birth certificate in Village Panchayat, Mana. However, he was informed that his birth is not registered at Village Panchayat. He, therefore, prayed that his application be allowed and his birth be registered on 06/07/1960. Along with said application the petitioner submitted the communication from the Village Panchayat that his birth is not recorded in the Village Panchayat. He has produced copy of relevant extract of his service book, wherein his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top