Back
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, B.U.DEBADWAR
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of vandana's marriage and subsequent harassment. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details on the incident leading to vandana's death. (Para 7 , 14) |
| 3. appellant's arguments and inconsistencies in dying declarations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. prosecution's failure to reliably establish guilt. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. medical opinions and cause of death. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. testimony of witnesses regarding incidents reported by vandana. (Para 37 , 38) |
| 7. court's rationale for not relying on contradictory dying declarations. (Para 68 , 69) |
| 8. final order and acquittal of the accused. (Para 80 , 82 , 84) |
JUDGMENT
B. U. Debadwar, J. - This Criminal Appeal has been directed against Judgment and order dated 16-06-2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, Dist. Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.49 of 2013 whereby convicted appellant / accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 506 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the 'I.P.C.') and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine further imprisonment for 6 months and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
