2020 Supreme(Bom) 966
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Sadhana S Jadhav, N.J. Jamadar, JJ.
Anand Roopchand Gajbhiye - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 736 of 2003, 1381 of 2003, 1382 of 2003
Decided On : 22-09-2020
Vilasini Balsubramaniam, Advocate, Sanjeev Kadam, Advocate, P.P. Shinde, Advocate
Headnote:
IPC - Assault and Attempt to Murder - Section 307, 326, 34 - The judgment discusses the conviction and acquittal of the accused for the offences punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The court analyzed the evidence and found that the prosecution succeeded in establishing the guilt of accused nos.1 and 4 for assaulting the first informant with intent to commit murder in furtherance of their common intention. The court also discussed the failure of the prosecution to establish the guilt of accused nos.2 to 8 and accused no.9 as an abettor. The judgment also includes the court's decision on the appeals filed by the accused and the state, and the final order of the court.
Fact of the Case:
The first informant, a member of the Legislative Assembly, was assaulted with intent to commit murder. Accused no.1 threw chilly powder in the eyes of the first informant, and accused no.4 assaulted the first informant with a sickle, causing a dangerous injury to the head. The prosecution succeeded in establishing the guilt of accused nos.1 and 4, while accused nos.2 to 8 and accused no.9 were acquitted.
Finding of the Court:
The court found accused nos.1 and 4 guilty of assaulting the first informant with intent to commit murder in furtherance of their common intention. The court also found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of accused nos.2 to 8 and accused no.9 as an abettor. The court set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC against accused no.1 and acquitted him. The court convicted accused no.4 for the offence punishable under Section 326 of the IPC and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for the period which he has already undergone and pay a fine of Rs.1,000.
Issues: The issues included the identification of the assailants, the credibility of the witnesses, and the establishment of the guilt of the accused for the offences charged.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the evaluation of the evidence, including the testimony of the witnesses, the medical evidence, and the circumstances of the case. The court found that the prosecution succeeded in establishing the guilt of accused nos.1 and 4, while the guilt of accused nos.2 to 8 and accused no.9 could not be established. The court also considered the settlement between the first informant and accused no.4, and modified the sentence accordingly.
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the appeal against conviction, set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence against accused no.1, acquitted him, and convicted accused no.4 for the offence punishable under Section 326 of the IPC. The court modified the sentence of accused no.4 to suffer imprisonment for the period which he has already undergone and pay a fine of Rs.1,000. The court also dismissed the appeal for enhancement of sentence.
JUDGMENT
N.J. Jamadar, J. - These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 31st May, 2003 in Sessions Case No.182 of 2000, whereby and whereunder accused no.1 Anand and accused no.4 Sandeep (Appellants in Appeal No.736/2003 and Respondents in Appeal No.1381/2003) came to be convicted for the offences punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC") and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for fve years and pay fne of Rs.1,000/- each, with default stipulation, and the accused nos.2, 3 and 5 to 9 came to be acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 149, 307 and 109 of the IPC.
2. The background facts leading to these appeals can be stated in brief as under:
(a) Mr. Vinayak Nimhan (hereinafter referred to as the frst informant) was elected as a Member of Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, in the elections held in the year 1999. A few days after the declaration of the result, Dasara Festival was being celebrated on 19th October, 1999. As a traditional practice at about 8.00 pm. the frst informant came in front of Prashant Genral Store, Pashan, to distribute bauhinia leaves i.e. (Apta - customary gold) to the citizens and well wishers. Suddenly a boy, who appeared to be around 24 year old, came in front of the frst informant. The said boy threw some substance in the eyes of the frst informant. As the frst informant felt burning sensation in the eyes he started to rub the eyes. In the meanwhile, two of the informant's associates Vilas Nimhan and Kailas Nimhan chased the said boy who fed away by the adjoining lane. Within moments of the said assault, few persons, who were hiding in another lane, came from behind and the frst informant was assaulted by means of sharp object on the head. The frst informant turned behind and noticed that accused nos.2 to 8 were feeing away. The associates of the frst informant and the persons who were then present at the scene of occurrence chased those assailants. As the frst informant sustained a bleeding injury, the frst informant's driver Hari and Chandrakant Nimhan shifted him to the Sancheti Hospital, Pune.
(b) The boy, who threw the chilly powder, (accused no.1 Anand) was apprehended by Vilas Nimhan and Kailas Nimhan after a chase. Accused no.1 was also brought at Sancheti Hospital and handed over to the police, who had reached the hospital on being apprised about the occurrence. At Sancheti Hospital, the police recorded the statement of the frst informant.
(c) The frst informant reported the police that accused nos.1 to 8 were the members of the gang of Ram Nimhan - accused no.9, who was inimically disposed towards the frst informant on account of the latter's rise in political stature and popularity. In the past, accused no.1 had threatened to eliminate the frst informant. The frst informant was thus assaulted with intent to commit murder. On the strength of the said report crime was registered at Chaturshrungi Police Station at CR No.365 of 1999 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the IPC. Thereupon investigation commenced.
(d) During the course of investigation, the Investigating Offcer sent a requisition to the Magistrate to record the statement of the frst informant. Accordingly, the Special Judicial Magistrate recorded the statement of the frst informant. Accused no.1 came to be arrested and the incriminating article i.e. mobile-phone handset of Samsung make came to be seized from the person of accused no.1. House search of the shop premises Jaybhavani Dry-cleaners, where the appellants were reported to be hiding, was conducted and incriminating articles including a pouch of chilly powder kept in a newspaper was seized under the panchnama. The Investigating Offcer visited the scene of occurrence and drew panchnama of the scene of occurrence on 20th October, 1999. The Investigating Offcer interrogated the witnesses and recorded their statements. The rest of the accused we