SADHANA S.JADHAV, N.J.JAMADAR
Anand Roopchand Gajbhiye – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
N.J. Jamadar, J. - These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 31st May, 2003 in Sessions Case No.182 of 2000, whereby and whereunder accused no.1 Anand and accused no.4 Sandeep (Appellants in Appeal No.736/2003 and Respondents in Appeal No.1381/2003) came to be convicted for the offences punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC") and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for fve years and pay fne of Rs.1,000/- each, with default stipulation, and the accused nos.2, 3 and 5 to 9 came to be acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 149, 307 and 109 of the IPC.
2. The background facts leading to these appeals can be stated in brief as under:
(a) Mr. Vinayak Nimhan (hereinafter referred to as the frst informant) was elected as a Member of Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, in the elections held in the year 1999. A few days after the declaration of the result, Dasara Festival was being celebrated on 19th October, 1999. As a traditional practice at about 8.00 pm. the frst informant came in front of Prashant Genral Store, Pashan, to distribute bauhinia leaves i.e. (Apta - customary gold) t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.