Back
SADHANA S.JADHAV, N.J.JAMADAR
Faiyaz @ Baba Arif Zariwala – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra (Through Gamdevi Police Station) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants contest judgment and sentence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. victim's abuse and circumstances leading to fir. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. witness testimonies corroborate victim's ordeal. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. investigative lapses and procedural failings noted. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. defenses raised by accused lacks credibility. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. victim's evidence emphasized over procedural lapses. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. delay in fir not detrimental to credibility. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. rape consequences on victim highlighted; defendant accountability stressed. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. conclusion and sentencing; appeals decided. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
JUDGMENT :
Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.
1. The appellant being aggrieved impugns the Judgment and Order dated 15th June, 2006 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Gr. Bombay in Sessions Case No. 957 of 1993, convicting the appellant for offence punishable under section 376 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- in default to undergo S.I. for one year.
2. Suc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
