SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 48

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
UJJAL BHUYAN, MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
Little Angels Education Society and others - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 1061 of 2020 With Writ Petition No. 1288 of 2020
Decided On : 25-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate a/w. Shashi Bekal.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sham Walve.

Point of Law: Taxation - Limitation – Delay of 365 days for filing assessment - Where there is delay of upto 365 days in filing Form No.10B for Assessment Year 2018-19 or for any subsequent Assessment Years, the Commissioners of Income-tax are hereby authorized to admit such belated applications of condonation of delay u/s.119(2) of the Act and decide on merits.

Headnote:

Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11, 12, 143(1) and 119(2) - Charitable trusts – Tax - Assessment - Condonation of delay - Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) declining to condone the delay in filing Form No.10B of the Act for the assessment year – Challenged - Commissioner of Income Tax – Power of - Petitioners are charitable trusts providing education to students belonging to middle class families through various schools situated in Mumbai.

Finding of the court: There was thus delay of more than 365 days in filing Form No.10B. Referring to the Circular, Commissioner noted that CBDT has delegated power to Commissioner to admit belated applications in filing Form No.10B for assessment year 2018-19 and onwards for a period of only upto 365 days - Since in this case the delay is more than 365 days, Commissioner expressed inability to condone the delay and hence rejected the application for condonation of delay - Court do not find any error or infirmity in the view taken by the CBDT vide Circular or by Commissioner while passing the impugned order - Fixing a period of one year’s delay i.e., 365 days of delay for condonation of delay in filing Form No.10B for the assessment year 2018-19 and onwards cannot be said to be arbitrary or irrational. Therefore the general order passed by the CBDT in this regard under section 119(2)(b) cannot be faulted. However, there is also nothing in section 119(2)(b) preventing or precluding CBDT from passing a special order in any given case from condoning the delay in filing Form No.10B beyond 365 days despite passing a general order.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

This order will dispose off both writ petition Nos.1061 and 1288 of 2020.

2. We have heard Dr. K. Shivaram, learned senior counsel for the two petitioners and Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel revenue for the respondents.

3. In Writ Petition No.1061 of 2020, Little Angels Education Society, Santacruz (West), Mumbai is the petitioner whereas in Writ Petition No.1288 of 2020, Rev. C. F. Andrews Education Society, Santacruz (East), Mumbai is the petitioner. Both the petitioners are charitable trusts providing education to students belonging to middle class families through various schools situated in Mumbai. Both the petitioners are assessed to income tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter).

4. Challenge made in both the writ petitions is to the orders dated 19.02.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai declining to condone the delay in filing Form No.10B of the Act for the assessment year 2018-2019.

5. Since facts are identical in both the petitions, for the sake of convenience we may refer to the facts pleaded in Writ Petition No.1061 of 2020.

6. It is stated that for the assessment year 2018-19, petitioner filed return of income on 25.07.2018 declaring nil income. Form No.10B was obtained on 15.08.2018 from the auditor. It is stated instead of uploading Form No.10B in the income tax portal, petitioner uploaded Form No.10BB because of mistake of the chartered accountant and accountant.

7. Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) of the Income Tax Department informed the petitioner vide letter dated 26.07.2019 about proposed adjustment in the income tax return for the assessment year 2018-19. Subsequently, petitioner received an intimation / order dated 17.10.2019 from the CPC under section 143(1) of the Act raising a demand of Rs.1,46,01,489.00 as payable by the petitioner for the assessment year 2018-19 by denying exemptions under sections 11 and 12 of the Act. This has been challenged by the petitioner in appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

8. Petitioner uploaded Form No.10B on the income tax portal on 06.11.2019 and also filed an application for condonation of delay. As a matter of fact, petitioner filed Form No.10B for assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19.

9. Respondent No.2 i.e., Central Board of Direct Taxes issued Circular No.2 of 2020 dated 03.01.2020 empowering the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) to condone the delay in filing Form No.10B for a period upto 365 days from the assessment year 2018-19 onwards.

10. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai requested the petitioner vide letter dated 04.02.2020 to furnish documents in connection with the application for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2018-19 which was complied with by the petitioner.

11. However, vide the impugned order dated 19.02.2020, Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai rejected the application of the petitioner for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2018-19. The said order was passed following Circular No.2 / 2020 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (for short 'CBDT').

12. Petitioner has stated that it had filed an application for condonation of delay in filing Form No.10B for the assessment year 2017-18 which was allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) by condoning the delay.

13. Aggrieved, the related writ petition has been filed for quashing of order dated 19.02.2020 and for a direction to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) to condone the delay in filing Form No.10B for the assessment year 2018-19.

14. Respondents have filed reply affidavit. It is stated that petitioner had filed return of income under section 139(1) of the Act on 15.08.2018 and revised return of income on 30.03.2019. Form No.10B was filed on 06.11.2019 which was after lapse of more than 365 days from the due date of filing of return of income. Reference has been made to the Circular No.2 of 2020 dated 03.01.2020 to contend

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top