IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
K.K. Tated, Abhay Ahuja, JJ
Shri Vijaysing Ajabsing Patil – Petitioner
Versus
Research Officer/Member Secretary, District. Caste Verification Committee and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (ST.) NO. 7238 of 2021
Decided On : 08-04-2021
Maharashtra Scheduled Castes', Scheduled Tribes; De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis) Nomadic Tribes', other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000, Sections 8 and 13 (B) - Granted of certificate – I validating caste claim of Petitioner as ‘Rajput Bhamta - It is claim of Petitioner he belongs to Hindu Rajput Bhamta caste - Petitioner submitted proposal for caste verification vide proposal Respondent No.1 Committee after caste claim of Petitioner was subjected to enquiry by Vigilance Cell who submitted its report - Submitted Petitioner was directed to file a fresh proposal was submitted by Petitioner and Petitioner submitted written submissions - Petitioner submits Petitioner had been consistently following up with Respondent No.1 and was being informed he would be communicated of outcome of pending proposal by post - He submits to his shock and surprise, he received notice issued by Respondent No.2 - Recruitment drive for backlog of backward community selection - Approached Respondent No.1 Scrutiny Committee since no decision was coming forth –
Finding of the Court : Affinity test may not be regarded as a litmus test for establishing link of applicant with a Scheduled – Tribe Nevertheless claim by an applicant he is a part of a scheduled tribe and is entitled to benefit extended to tribe, cannot per se be disregarded on ground his present traits do not match his tribes’ peculiar anthropological and ethnological traits, deity, rituals, customs, mode of marriage, death ceremonies, method of burial of dead bodies - Scrutiny committee has also observed forefathers of Petitioner did not belong to ‘Rajput Bhamta’ caste - Petitioner does not belong to ‘Rajput Bhamta’ Caste and has declared caste claim of Petitioner as invalid - Considering aforesaid incontrovertible findings of fact by caste scrutiny committee – Court are not inclined to interfere with order of District Caste Certificate Verification Committee –
Result: Petition is dismissed
JUDGMENT :
By this Petition, the Petitioner is seeking quashing and setting aside the order dated 15th March 2021 passed by Respondent No. 1-District Caste Verification Committee, Thane invalidating the caste claim of the Petitioner as ‘Rajput Bhamta’. It is the claim of the Petitioner that he belongs to Hindu Rajput Bhamta caste which falls in V.J. category and has been granted caste certificate dated 6th August 1993 by the Competent Officer.
2. Petitioner submitted proposal for caste verification on 4/4/2003 vide proposal No.541 of 2003 to the Respondent No.1-Committee after which the caste claim of the Petitioner was subjected to enquiry by the Vigilance Cell who submitted its report on 25th July, 2003. The Vigilance report is annexed at Exhibit-D (page 30 to the petition). It is submitted that based on its enquiry, the petitioner’s caste appeared to be ‘Rajput Bhamta’.
3. It is submitted that the Petitioner was directed to file a fresh proposal which was submitted by the Petitioner on 24th November 2010 and Petitioner submitted written submissions on 18th June 2013 pursuant to the request dated 1st June 2013 by the Respondent No.1-Committee.
4. Petitioner submits that Petitioner had been consistently following up with Respondent No.1 and was being informed that he would be communicated of the outcome of the pending proposal by post. He submits that to his shock and surprise, he received notice issued by the Respondent No.2 dated 13th January 2021 Additional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Konkan Division, Navi Mumbai whereby Petitioner was called for hearing scheduled on 28th January 2021. It is pertinent to refer that earlier the Petitioner based on caste certificate dated 6th August 1993 was appointed as Junior Clerk with the Co-operative Officer, Co-operative Society, Vengurla vide order dated 31st December 2003 pursuant to the recruitment drive for backlog of backward community. Pursuant to the selection, by order dated 12th March 2003 Respondent No.l- Caste Scrutiny Committee requested the Petitioner to submit certain documents with the Divisional Social Welfare Officer pursuant to which the proposal referred to above was submitted by the Petitioner for caste verification.
5. Pursuant to the notice for hearing scheduled on 28th January 2021, Petitioner participated in the said hearing and filed reply with the Respondent No.1. The Respondent No.2-employer also passed order on 28th January 2021 requesting the Petitioner to submit caste validity certificate within a period of 15 days else suitable action would be initiated against the Petitioner.
6. Petitioner thereafter approached Respondent No.1-Scrutiny Committee. However, since no decision was coming forth, Writ Petition St. No.2920 of 2021 was filed pursuant to which by order dated 18th February 2021, Petitioner was directed to submit the relevant documents on or before 26th February 2021 whereupon a decision was directed to be taken on or before 19th March 2021.
7. Thereafter Petitioner has submitted documents listed in paragraph 1(s) of the Petition and also referred to on pages 2 to 4 of the Impugned Order. After submission of documents by the Petitioner, Respondent No.1, directed scrutiny of documents and issued notice to submit written explanation vide letter dated 5th March, 2021 as the documents were insufficient and inconclusive to prove caste claim. Petitioner appeared before the Respondent No.1- Scrutiny Committee on 10th March, 2021 and submitted written explanation after which Respondent No.1- Scrutiny Committee vide order dated 15th March, 2021 rejected the caste claim of the Petitioner.
8. Being aggrieved by the same, Petitioner is before us seeking quashing of order of the Respondent no.1 dated 15th March 2021 and for protection of employment as Junior Clerk with Respondent No.2.
9. Learned counsel Shri Kulkarni appearing for the Petitioner has taken us through the genealogy of the Petitioner which is set out as under :
Gulab (Great Grandfather) KHAN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.