V.M.DESHPANDE
Butibori CEPT Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel Shri A.M.Ghare for the petitioner and learned counsel Shri Nitin Lalwani, who submitted that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.1 and he has already filed his Vakalatnama and he does not wish to file any reply to the writ petition. The statement is accepted. Also, heard Advocate Shri Ranjeet Singh Gehlot h/f learned counsel Shri A.C.Jaltare for respondent No.2 and learned counsel Shri R.M.Bhangde for respondent No.3. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for parties.
2. At the outset, learned counsel Shri A.M.Ghare for the petitioner submitted that he is not pressing prayer clause (d) of the writ petition at this stage and will file appropriate application, if so advised.
3. Respondent No.1 filed special civil suit for declaration, injunction, and recovery of money against the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 and 3. The said suit was registered as Special Civil Suit No.487/2019. Along with plaint, respondent No.1 also filed an application for interim relief under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2. The said application is at Exhibit 5 and is pending on the file of learned Judge of Court belo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.