SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD
T.V. NALAWADE & M.G. SEWLIKAR, JJ.
Namdev Sahebrao Garad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya & Others – Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition No. 691 of 2019
Decided On : 03-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:A.S. Kale h/f. Talekar & Associates, Advocates
For the Respondents: M.M. Nerlikar, Rajendra S. Deshmukh, Senior Counsel

The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for trustees to adhere to the provisions of the trust scheme and relevant laws, and the importance of a scientific and secular approach in dealing with matters involving religious trusts.

Headnote:

Illegal Activity - Trustee's Misappropriation - Maharashtra Public Trust Act, Sections 41-B, 420, 406 of I.P.C. - The court found that the trustees of the trust had committed illegal activities, including misappropriation of property and spreading superstition, which were not permitted under the trust scheme and the Maharashtra Public Trust Act. The court also highlighted the provisions of the Black Magic Act and the need for a scientific approach in such matters. The court directed the concerned police station to register a crime for conspiracy, cheating, misappropriation, breach of trust, and offenses under the Black Magic Act based on the complaint by ANIS, and ordered the investigation to be completed within six months.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a former trustee of a trust, sought various reliefs, alleging illegal activities by the trustees, including burying gold in the name of Yantras and misappropriating funds. The respondent trust denied the allegations and argued that the matter was already under inquiry.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the trustees had committed illegal activities, including misappropriation of property and spreading superstition, which were not permitted under the trust scheme and the Maharashtra Public Trust Act. The court also highlighted the provisions of the Black Magic Act and the need for a scientific approach in such matters.

Issues: The main issues were the alleged illegal activities of the trustees, the failure of authorities to take action, and the need for a secular and scientific approach in dealing with such matters.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the trustees' actions were in violation of the trust scheme and the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, and also fell under the prohibited acts mentioned in the Black Magic Act. The court emphasized the need for a scientific approach and adherence to the provisions of the law in such cases.

Final Decision: The court directed the concerned police station to register a crime for conspiracy, cheating, misappropriation, breach of trust, and offenses under the Black Magic Act based on the complaint by ANIS, and ordered the investigation to be completed within six months.

JUDGMENT :

T.V. Nalawade, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for final disposal.

2. Following reliefs are claimed in the present proceeding:-

    “A) To call entire record of accounts and audits of the respondent trust from 2009-2019 including details of precious metals collected and procedure undertaken on it and permit copy of the same to the petitioner;

B) To direct the respondents to register FIR against the persons involved in commission of crime in light of complaint made by the petitioner, by issuing a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction as the case may be;

C) To supervise and monitor the investigation in respect of alleged complaints, by invoking its inherent and plenary powers;

D) To direct the Central Bureau of Intelligence to conduct preliminary inquiry and call for original records from the trust, pending hearing and final disposal of this petition;

E) To direct the respondents to excavate and dig out the alleged enchanted gold hidden under the statue of goddesses of the temple to re-energise the temple and deity, to verify the purity of the gold for the purpose of police investigation, pending hearing and final disposal of the petition;

F) To grant any other relief to which the petitioners are entitled to.”

3. The petitioner was trustee for some time of Jagdamba Devi Sarvajanik Trust and temple of this Goddess is situated at Mohote, District Ahmednagar. It is his contention that he wants aforesaid reliefs as he is citizen of India and he is resident of Mohote where the present property is situated.

4. It is contention of the petitioner that during the year 2011 and afterwards some illegal acts were committed by the trustees of aforesaid trust and they involve burying of around 2 k.g. of gold in the name of Yantras and showing additional expenditure of Rs.25 lakh for doing ceremonies in respect of so called Yantras. It is submitted that there is clear probability that by showing that Yantras weighing 2 k.g. of gold were buried, the gold and aforesaid amount was misappropriated and so, these acts of the trustees need to be investigated by the police. He has mentioned the names of the persons who were shown as engaged for creation and burial of the so called Yantras in the petition and it is contended that the selection process of the said person was also not proper and that also creates probability that everything was pre-decided and accordingly, aforesaid illegal activity is done by the trustees. It is submitted that though judicial officer of the rank of District Judge acts as a Chairman of the trust, the aforesaid activities were done and the trustees prepared false documents even when judicial officer of aforesaid rank is involved in the management. It is contended that in the past also person who was working as Project Officer had committed illegal activities and in the year 2010 inquiry was made against that Project Officer and the same Project Officer continued to work as Chief Executive Officer (hereinafter referred to as ‘C.E.O.’ for short of the trust and this circumstance creates a probability that from many years such illegal activities of the trust are going on. It is contended that even the auditor appointed to do the audit was not eligible and he was not possessing requisite qualification for conducting audit and it also shows that everything was pre-planned.

5. In the petition, other allegations are made in respect of other irregularities like not showing the account in respect of live stock given as donation, the development of forest land and spending amount under other heads without calling tenders etc. Though these allegations are there, during arguments the learned counsel for petitioner submitted that he is pressing for relief of registration of crime and that too, in respect of the so called burial of 2 k.g. of gold and showing expenditure of Rs.25 lakh for so called religious ceremonies performed for preparation and burial of Yantras

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top