IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.J. KATHAWALLA, VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
Vilas Vitthal Sakhare and Others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra through Secretary Rural Development Department – Respondent
Writ Petition (ST) No. 98240 of 2020
Decided On : 13-01-2021
Writ Petition - Challenge to Final Voters List - Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, Section 12; Representation of People’s Act - The court discussed the preparation of the draft voter's list, objections raised by the petitioners, and the powers of the State Election Commission and Election Commission of India in finalizing the voter's list. The court also referred to Article 243K and Article 243-O of the Constitution of India, and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. The court dismissed the petition, citing the advanced stage of the election process and the availability of alternate remedies.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to challenge the final voters list prepared for the Hinjawadi Grampanchayat Election, citing irregularities in the State Assembly Election Voter's list and raising objections to the inclusion and exclusion of names in specific wards.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the petition, stating that the election process had reached an advanced stage, and it would not be desirable to stall the election process. The court also highlighted the availability of alternate remedies under Rule 23 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 and Section 15 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
Issues: The issues involved the preparation and finalization of the voter's list for the Grampanchayat Election, the objections raised by the petitioners, and the powers of the State Election Commission and Election Commission of India.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the advanced stage of the election process, the principles established by the Supreme Court regarding stalling of elections, and the availability of alternate remedies under relevant laws.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was dismissed, with the court clarifying that the petitioners are at liberty to pursue alternate remedies available to them in law.
JUDGMENT :
S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
1. By the above Writ Petition, the Petitioners seek to challenge the final voters list prepared for the purpose of Hinjawadi Grampanchayat Election which is scheduled to be held on 15th January, 2021.
2. The reliefs sought in the above Writ Petition are as follows:
(a) Direct the Respondents to correct the draft voter's list and/or to prepare a corrected final voter's list for the Respondent No. 6's general election.
(b) Direct the Respondents to ensure that residents from outside the Respondent No. 6 are not added to the voter's list as also voters from the Gram Panchayat be shown in their rightful wards.
(c) Direct the Respondents to delete the voters shown from S. No. 1 to S. Nos. 342 of the voter's list of Ward No. 5 and include same in Ward No. 3.
(d) Direct the Respondents to delete the names shown from Serial Nos. 343 to 534 in voter's list of Ward No. 5 and same be included in Ward No. 4.
(e) Direct the Respondents to remove the names added from outside gram panchayat area as enumerated at Exhibit-O herein.”
3. The facts which are relevant for deciding the above Writ Petition are in brief set out hereunder:
3.2 By another circular of the same date, further directions were given as to how the draft voter's list was to be finalised.
3.3 As per the directions of the Election Commission, the voters list utilised for the last State Assembly Elections for Maharashtra as updated upto 25th September, 2020, was to be considered for the preparation draft voter's list of the Respondent No. 6.
3.4 In exercise of the powers under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, the State Election Commission has adopted the electoral roll prepared for the assembly elections by the Election Commission of India under the Representation of People’s Act and 25th September, 2020 was fixed as the cut of date. The said electoral roll was divided into the wards of villages and the draft voter’s list was prepared.
3.5 According to the Petitioners, they noticed several irregularities in the State Assembly Election Voter's list itself.
3.6 On 3rd December, 2020 the Petitioner No. 1 fled his objections with the Respondent No. 5 i.e. the Tahsildar, Tal. Mulshi, Pune.
3.7 The Petitioner No. 2 also fled his objections on 7th December, 2020, pointing out how certain names should not be included in a particular ward, but should be included in another ward and the names incorrectly included in a particular Ward should be removed.
3.8 The alleged irregularities were once again pointed out by the Petitioner No. 1 vide his Letter addressed to the Tahsildar dated 10th December, 2020.
3.9 Since no response was received, the Petitioners fled the above Writ Petition on 12th December, 2020 seeking reliefs as set out in paragraph 2 above.
3.10 The final voter's list was published on 14th December, 2020.
4. The Learned Advocate appearing for the State Election Commission on instructions from Mr. Hemant Naikwadi, Circle Officer, Hinjawadi, Tal. Mulshi, who is present in Court, states that the objections raised by the Petitioners have been considered by the Sub-Divisional Officer and it is only thereafter, that the final list of voters has been published. In other words, the SDO did not find any substance in the objections of the Petitioners, and rejected the same. The Learned Advocate for the State Election Commission relying on a Notification dated 20th November, 2020, issued by the State Election Commission, particularly Clause 3(c) thereof, submitted that the State Election Commission is not empowered to delete/add any names on the ground of absenteeism, shifting, death of individual/s residing in a particular area
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.