R.D.DHANUKA, V.G.BISHT
Valentine Maritime Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kreuz Subsea Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.D. DHANUKA, J.
1. By these two appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the Arbitration Act”) both these appellants (original respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2 respectively) have impugned the order passed by the learned Single Judge granting interim measures in favour of the respondent no. 1 (original petitioner) under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.
2. The appellant in Commercial Appeal (L) No. 7013 of 2020 has impugned the entire order passed by the learned Single Judge whereas the appellant in Commercial Appeal (L) No. 8386 of 2020 has impugned the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in paragraph 42(e)(i) to (vi) of the order dated 11th November 2020. By consent of parties, both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by common order. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding these two appeals are as under.
3. On 21st August 2019, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as “ONGC”) entered into a contract with the appellant i.e. Valentine Maritime Limited (hereinafter referred to as “VML”) for laying of 165.77 kms. subsea pipeline spread in 23 segments
Adhunik Steels Ltd. vs. Orissa Manganese and Minerals (P) Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 125
Essar Oil Ltd. vs. Hindustan Shipyard Ltd. and Others
Firm Ashok Traders and Another vs. Gurmukhdas Saluja and Others
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003) 5 SCC 705
Raman Tech. and Process Engg. Co. and Another vs. Solanki Traders
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.