SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 162

S.S.SHINDE, MANISH PITALE
Vineet Kumar Balkrishna – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Saurabh B. Rane.
For the Respondents: Maroof Khan, A.S. Pai.

JUDGMENT :

S.S. SHINDE, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Learned counsel appearing for applicants and Respondent No. 2 jointly submits that the applicants and Respondent No. 2 have amicably settled the dispute and to that effect, the affidavit is filed by Respondent No. 2.

3. The parties are identified by their respective advocates. On 13.01.2021 the applicants were present in the Court. On interaction with the applicants, they have stated that they are doing their respective jobs and they have not indulged in any such alleged activities.

4. The Respondent No. 2 is present before this Court. He stated that it is his voluntary act to enter into such settlement and give no objection for quashing the impugned FIR. He stated that the pillow covers and bed sheets were given for cleaning and those were not returned by the applicants, therefore out of misunderstanding the impugned FIR was registered.

5. Since the applicants and Respondent No. 2 have amicably settled the dispute and Respondent No. 2 has no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top