PRASANNA.B.VARALE, PRAKASH D.NAIK
Mohd. Ismail Abdul Hadis Maniyar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prakash D. Naik, J.
1. The appellant and accused No.2 were prosecuted for the offence under Section 302 , 201 r/w. 109 of INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short “IPC”). The First Information Report (for short “FIR”) was registered vide C.R.No. 222 of 2012 registered with Ghatkopar Police Station.
2. The case of the prosecution is as under:
(b) Fire Brigade was called and body of the female was taken out. It was taken to Rajawadi Hospital by mobile van of Ghatkopar Police Station. Medical Officer at Rajawadi Hospital examined the body and found that the female was brought dead.
(c) Inquest Panchnama Exh.36 was prepared on 16th June 2012 in presence of two panch witnesses, one of whom was Salma Ayuf Khan (PW-9). There was green top and black salvar on the dead body. One metal finger ring, mangalsutra, ear
State of Goa V/s. Sanjay Thakran & Anr. (2007) 3 SCC 755
Anjan Kumar Sarma V/s. State of Assam
Ajay Singh V/s. State of Maharashtra
Sukhjit Singh V/s. State of Punjab
Sharad Birdichand Sarada V/s. State of Maharashtra
Shambu Nath Mehra V/s. State of Ajmer
Joseph S/O Kooveli Poulo vs State Of Kerala
State of Maharashtra Vs. Suresh)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.