SADHANA S.JADHAV, N.J.JAMADAR
Anand Roopchand Gajbhiye – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.J. Jamadar, J.
1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 31st May, 2003 in Sessions Case No.182 of 2000, whereby and whereunder accused no.1 Anand and accused no.4 Sandeep (Appellants in Appeal No.736/2003 and Respondents in Appeal No.1381/2003) came to be convicted for the offences punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”) and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each, with default stipulation, and the accused nos.2, 3 and 5 to 9 came to be acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 149, 307 and 109 of the IPC.
2. The background facts leading to these appeals can be stated in brief as under:
Takhaji Hiraji vs. Thakore Kubersing Chamansing & ors. (2001) 6 SCC 145
Rajendra Singh & Ors. v. State of Bihar
Ram Sunder Yadav & Ors. v. State of Bihar
Viayee Singh & Ors. v. State of U.P.
Abuthagir and others vs. State represented through Inspector of Police
Ranbir v. State of Punjab [(1973) 2 SCC 444]
Bodhraj v. State of J & K [(2002) 8 SCC 45]
Banti v. State of M.P. [(2004) 1 SCC 414]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.