SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Bom) 1264

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NITIN JAMDAR, MILIND JADHAV, JJ.
JK Paper Limited – Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India – Respondent
Writ Petition (L) No. 3441 of 2020
Decided On : 06-10-2020

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Ameya Gokhale, Radhika Indapurkar i/b. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co., Advocates.
For the Respondent:Rafique Dada, Senior Advocate with Omprakash Jha, Shivani Kumbhojkar i/b. The Law Point, Advocates.

Headnote:

SEBI - Securities and Exchange Board of India - Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, Companies Act, 2013, Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 - Regulations of 2014 - [11, 11A, 30 of the Act of 1992, 62 of the Companies Act of 2013, rule 12 of Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014] - The court discussed the applicability of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014 to the petitioner, JK Paper Limited, and the refusal of SEBI to grant a personal hearing for an exemption application under Regulation 29. The court analyzed the provisions of the Regulations, the power of SEBI to relax strict enforcement, and the requirement of personal hearing, ultimately concluding that there is no duty on SEBI to provide a personal hearing for exemption applications under Regulation 29.

Fact of the Case:

The Petitioner, JK Paper Limited, sought a personal hearing from SEBI for an exemption application under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014. SEBI refused the request, leading to the petition to direct SEBI to grant a personal hearing.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there is no duty on SEBI to provide a personal hearing for exemption applications under Regulation 29 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014.

Issues: The main issue was whether SEBI is obliged to grant a personal hearing to the petitioner while considering an exemption application under the Regulations of 2014.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the power to grant relaxation under Regulation 29 is a discretionary power and the conditions to be imposed are in the interest of the investors. It concluded that there is no duty on SEBI to provide a personal hearing for exemption applications under Regulation 29.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no order as to costs. The court extended the period for submitting additional material/submissions by fifteen days from the date the order was uploaded on the server.

JUDGMENT :

Nitin Jamdar, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.

2. The Petitioner, JK Paper Limited, requested the Respondent- Securities and Exchange Board of India for a personal hearing regarding exemption application filed by it under a regulation governing employee stock options. The Board of SEBI refused the request for personal hearing and permitted additional written submissions. Petitioner has filed this petition to direct the Board to grant a personal hearing.

3. The question therefore is: whether the Board is obliged to grant a personal hearing to the petitioner while considering an exemption application under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014. The answer is-No. The facts and the reasons for this conclusion are as follows.

4. The Petitioner- JK Paper Limited is a public limited company. The Petitioner manufactures and supplies paper and board. The Respondent, Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI, is established under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

5. SEBI, in the year 1999, had framed "Securities and Exchange Board of India (Employee Stock Option Scheme and Employee Stock Purchase Scheme) Guidelines, 1999" which provided for the stock-based incentive schemes to employees. On 28 October 2014, SEBI notified Securities and Exchange Board of India (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014, ("Regulations of 2014"). SEBI has framed the Regulations of 2014 in the exercise of the power conferred by sections 11, 11A and 30 of the Act of 1992 read with section 62 of the Companies Act of 2013 and rule 12 of Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014. The Regulations govern the following schemes: (a) employee stock option schemes; (b) employee stock purchase schemes; (c)stock appreciation rights schemes; (d) general employee benefits schemes; and (e)retirement benefit schemes consequent upon which the existing guidelines have been repealed. The Regulations shall apply to those companies whose shares are listed on any recognised stock exchange in India, and which fulfils the following: (i) has a scheme for the direct or indirect benefit of employees; (ii )involves dealing in or subscribing to or purchasing securities of the company, directly or indirectly; and which has a scheme set up by the company or any other company in its group; the scheme is funded or guaranteed by the company or any other company in its group; the scheme is controlled or managed by the company or any other company in its group. The Regulations of 2014 lay down various regulatory measures regarding such a scheme. The object of the Regulations of 2014 is to check and prevent manipulation of share prices in the larger interest of the investors.

6. The Petitioner, in January 2004, formed an employee welfare trust named JK Paper Welfare Trust. Around ninety seven percent of its assets are shares of the Petitioner and around 4.73% of its share capital. The Trust administers Continuity Facility Assistance Scheme; Medical Assistance Scheme; Education Scholarship Scheme; and Prize Scheme for Sports.

7. On 7 May 2018, the Petitioner sought clarification regarding the Regulations of 2014. By letter dated 29 June 2018, SEBI provided guidance to the Petitioner. SEBI informed that the Regulations of 2014 apply to the Petitioner.

8. On 24 October 2019, the Petitioner applied seeking relaxation from the applicability of Regulations under the Regulation 29 of the Regulations of 2014, the SEBI is empowered to grant relaxation for the strict compliance of the Regulations.. Relying upon Regulation 29, the Petitioner sought exemption from the strict compliance of Regulations 1(3), 1(4), 3(1), 26(2) and 31(2)(b)(i) and (ii). Reasons for exemption were in the application.

9. By communication dated 3 February 2020, the SEBI rejected the Petitioner’s request for exemption. The communication did not spell out any reasons for rejection. The Pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top