SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Bom) 353

PENDSE
CUTCHI VISA OSWAL DERAWASI JAIN MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
B. D. BORUDE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant :Shri J.P. Cama, Advocate
For The Respondent:Dr. R.S. kulkarni, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Pendse, J.—By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners-employer are challenging the legality of Award part-1 declared by the Industrial Tribunal on March 4, 1982 holding that the employer-trust is an undertaking and an industry within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The facts giving rise to filing of the petition are as follows.

2. The petitioner-trust was formed in the year 1958 and was registered as Society under the Societies Registration Act. The aims and objects of the Trust were to achieve unity amongst Cuthci Visa Oswal Derawasi Jain, to achieve development and progress to their religious, social and educational life and activities, to establish temples. Dharmashalas, educational institutions etc., to institute all acts and activities aimed for furthering fraternity and unity amongst Jain and to raise funds by acceptance of donations, subscriptions, contribution etc. The Trust possesses large number of properties in Bombay and had employed about 42 workmen in different sections for carrying out various duties. The workmen employed by the Trust formed a union and submitted the demands in res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top