SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Bom) 340

D.P.MADON
MSCO (P) LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
S. D. RANE – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. This Writ Petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order passed on March 27, 1978, by the 1st respondent who is the Presiding Officer of the 5th Labour Court. The petitioner, a private limited company, are carrying on the business of manufacture of hospital, pharmaceutical and laboratory equipments. On September 17, 1968, the petitioners appointed the 3rd respondent as a clerk. By a letter dated April 29, 1977, the petitioners terminated the services of the 3rd respondent with effect from May 3, 1977. The 2nd respondent-union took up the cause of the 3rd respondent and demanded that he should be reinstated in service. Ultimately, on August 19, 1977, the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Admn), Bombay, by his order of the same date referred the dispute - with respect to the reinstatement of the 3rd respondent for adjudication to respondent for adjudication to respondent No. 1. After receipt of the order of reference, notices were issued by the office of the Respondent No. 1, both to the petitioners and the respondents No. 2. By the said notice, respondents No. 2 were called upon to file their statement of claim and the petitioners to file

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top