JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner has impugned in the present petition, under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, the judgment and order passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Pune on 27 July 1989 in revision application filed by the petitioner against the judgment and order of the Second Labour Court, Pune, on 16 December 1985, in his complaint of unfair labour practice against respondent 1. The petitioner was in the employment of the first respondent as a machinist from 1 September 1970 and was designated as Assistant Supervisor on promotion at the time when his services were terminated with effect from 8 April 1984.

2. Being aggrieved by the said order of termination from employment the petitioner filed a complaint of Unfair Labour Practice under S. 28 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with items (1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (1)(f) and (1)(g) of Sch. IV of the Act. The petitioner had challenged the said order of termination on the ground that it was in violation of S. 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, read with rule 82 framed thereunder. The nub of the petitioner's complaint was that the first respondent-employer had not prepared a s