IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
V.K. JADHAV, SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
Tulshiram S/o Balaji Pupalwad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 385 of 2014
Decided on : 07-07-2021
MURDER - Indian Penal Code - Section 302, Section 34 - The judgment and order of conviction passed in Sessions Case No.20 of 2011 by the Additional Sessions Judge at Biloli dated 24.05.2013 is confirmed. The sentence awarded is maintained.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased and the accused had a political rivalry due to Grampanchayat elections. The accused armed with a knife attacked the deceased while he was weighing Soyabean, causing fatal injuries. The prosecution proved the charge of murder against the accused no.1 Tulshiram beyond reasonable doubt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the accused guilty of murder under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the trial court.
Issues: The main issue was whether the accused was guilty of the murder of the deceased. The court also considered the alternative argument to convert the conviction from section 302 to section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the prosecution had successfully proved the charge of murder against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The court also rejected the alternative argument to convert the conviction to section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code.
Final Decision: The Criminal Appeal stands dismissed. The impugned judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli is confirmed. The sentence awarded is maintained. The appointed counsel's professional fees are quantified at Rs.5,000, to be transferred to the Covid fund of the State of Maharashtra.
JUDGMENT :
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction passed in Sessions Case No.20 of 2011 by the Additional Sessions Judge at Biloli dated 24.05.2013 whereby the appellant/original accused no.1 has been convicted of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The prosecution case in narrow compass is as under:
2(ii) According to the prosecution story, the accused had contested the Grampanchayat election of Patoda on 2-3 occasions, but he was defeated. In September 2010, one Kalawatibai a member from the party of the deceased had contested the Grampanchayat election and she was elected unopposed. For the said election, the deceased and the first informant had extended help to Kalawatibai for the victory. In the same Grampanchayat election of September 2010, the sister-in-law of the accused had filled-in nomination form, but her nomination form came to be rejected. It is alleged that the accused had grudge in his mind against the deceased due to his defeat in Grampanchyat election as well as defeat of his sister-in-law.
2(iii) It was about 1.00 p.m., accused armed with big knife rushed towards the platform where the work of weighing of Soyabean was going on. The accused alleged to have made attack on the person of the deceased Shankar. The accused alleged to have given blow of knife in his abdomen. The accused alleged to have stated to the deceased that because of him, his life is ruined and he always support to the opposite party and because of that he never won the Grampanchayat election. After giving first blow by knife, accused took out the knife and gave second blow on the neck of the deceased and fled away.
2(iv) Shankar was seriously injured in the attack and he was taken to the hospital at Barbada by the first informant where he was declared dead.
2(v) On the basis of first information report lodged by Balaji, on 15.12.2010 with Police Station Kandhar, crime No.107 of 2010 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code came to be registered.
2(vi) On the basis of supplementary statement given by the first informant, two more accused namely Sanjay and Balaji were roped in the said crime. Both the accused alleged to have instigated the present accused and they alleged to have committed murder of Shankar with common intention.
2(vii) After making attack on the deceased, the present accused alleged to have taken shelter in the house of Bajirao Hambarde (PW No.5). The intimation was given to the police and police rushed to the house of Bajirao Hambarde at village Patoda where from accused Tulshiram taken into custody armed with knife. The dead body was sent to the hospital for postmortem and report. The investigating officer has seized the knife from the accused under seizure panchanama as well as clothes on his person at that time. The clothes of deceased also came to be sized. Seized clothes of deceased, clothes of accused and weapon recovered from him were sent to Chemical Analyzer for analysis and report. The investigation agency collected the Chemical Analyzer’s report during course of investigation. The investigating officer has recorded the statements of witnesses including two eye witnesses namely Sambaji and Bajirao.
2(viii) The investigating officer found sufficient incriminating evidence against the accused and filed charge-sheet against in all three accused persons for the offence punishable under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.