SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, ABHAY AHUJA
Co-operative Rabobank U A – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT), Mumbai-2 – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ABHAY AHUJA, J.
1. By this Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, Petitioner is challenging the validity of Form-3, dated 28th January, 2021 and 26th March, 2021 issued under Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (the “DTVSV Act”) by the Designated Authority for Assessment Year 2002-2003.
2. Petitioner is a bank established in the Netherlands and it is a part of the Rabobank Group worldwide. It is submitted that Petitioner is a regular assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “IT Act”).
3. Petitioner had filed a Return of Income on 31st March, 2003 declaring nil income. The Assessment Order was passed on 28th March, 2005 assessing business profits attributable to permanent establishment (PE) at Rs.31,25,060/-. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)”] on 28th April, 2005. The CIT(A), by its order dated 15th May, 2006 deleted the addition, holding that Petitioner does not have a PE in India. Thereafter, the assessing officer filed Appeal before the Tribunal on 11th August, 2006. The Tribunal, by its order dated 1st April, 2015, restored the issue to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.