IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Ravindra V. Ghuge, S.G. Mehare, JJ.
Prakash Singa Gavit – Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India, Through the Secretary, Petroleum Department, New Delhi and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.14405 of 2017
Decided On : 03-09-2021
Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 244 - Writ of mandamus - Review meeting - selection of LPG Distributorship - Unified Guidelines - Sought for directions to respondents to implement recommendations of National Commission for Scheduled Tribes as per review meeting so far as petro product dealership in tribal area of Maharashtra is concerned also the guidelines for selection of LPG Distributorship and on its perusal or otherwise, quash and set aside entire selection procedure, reservation/ earmarking of the aforementioned location for other category except S.T. be quashed and set aside.
Finding of the court : Petroleum Companies have announced that applicants belonging to Scheduled Tribe category would be given preference considering needs of tribals in such areas. Several candidates belonging to Scheduled Tribe category have applied for such distributorship and there is no dispute that many applicants belonging to Scheduled Tribe category in the “Durgam Kshetra” (farflung hilly areas) have been selected and allotted distributorship. Surprisingly and without any reason, petitioner voluntarily chose to remain away from advertisement and did not apply for obtaining a distributorship - Absence of any legal injury, we would not invoke our jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India - Petition in hand and prayer clauses put forth in backdrop of settled position of law, court find that petitioner has preferred this petition on speculation that if this Court approves 100% reservation for Scheduled Tribes in matters of grant of LPG distributorship in scheduled areas, his village may acquire a distributorship location and he may then compete with other persons belonging to the Scheduled Tribes and then he may acquire an allotment. Court find such submissions to be quite far fetched - This petition does not put forth any legal injury suffered by petitioner and does not espouse a personal cause.
Result : Writ Petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.
1. By this petition, the petitioner has put forth prayer clauses AA, B, C and D as under :-
B. Issue writ of certiorari or appropriate writ and call for the record and proceedings of the advertisement dated 31.08.2017 published by respondent No.2 to 4 as also the guidelines of June 2017, for selection of LPG Distributorship and on its perusal or otherwise, quash and set aside the entire selection procedure, reservation/ earmarking of the aforementioned location for other category except S.T. be quashed and set aside.
C. Issue writ of certiorari or appropriate writ and call for the entire material including the Unified Guidelines for selection of LPG Distributorship framed in June, 2017 by respondent No.2 to 4 and quash and set aside the above clauses of the said guidelines.
D. Issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to re-advertise the above locations in the villages and locations notified under PESA Act, to the Scheduled Tribe candidate only.”
2. On 13.12.2017, this Court (Coram : P.B. Varale and S.K.Kotwal, JJ) had passed the following order:-
2. Mr. Bhandari, learned counsel waives service for respondent No.1 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and prays for two weeks time to take instructions and file reply. Two weeks time granted to Mr. Bhandari, learned counsel to file reply. Notice to other respondent/s made returnable on 10th January 2018.
3. In view of the order passed by the Division Bench at Nagpur Bench, the respondents are permitted to complete the process of selection of L.P.G. Dealer, however, no orders be issued to the selected person/s.”
3. There is no dispute that Writ Petition No.6844/2017 and other connected petitions were dismissed by this Court at Nagpur.
4. On 27.06.2018, this Court (Coram : R.M.Borde and A.M.Dhavale, JJ) had passed the following order :-
As to whether Respondents No.2, 3 and 4 – Petroleum Corporations are bound to provide reservation in the matter of appointing LPG distributors in the difficult (durgam) areas, which are brought under the applicability of provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (for short, 'the PESA Act').
2. The petitioner contends that the advertised location Bhamarmal, Tq. Navapur, is brought under the coverage of the PESA Act and similarly most of the places in Sakri, Shirpur, talukas of Dhule district and the areas forming part of Nandurbar district, Taloda, Dhadgaon, Akkalkua, Akruni, Navapur and Shahada talukas, are populated with Scheduled Tribe community population. It is contended that the culture, traditions as well as local language of Adivasis is distinct. It is the contention of the petitioner that since the provisions of PESA Act are made applicable to the Scheduled areas, it is incumbent upon the Respondent-Corporations to provide reservation in favour of Scheduled Tribe population on par with the provision of reservation made in respect of various categories in North-Eastern States of Arunachal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.