SURENDRA P.TAVADE
Sangita W/o. Nitin Dhakne – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The applicant has filed this application for quashing the order of issue process passed against her by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Parli-Vaijnath, Dist. Beed in RCC No.270 of 2011. The applicant has completed MBBS, DGO. She is running a hospital along with Sonography Diagnostic Center. Her center is registered under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 [for short “PCPNDT Act”] and Rules framed thereunder. The applicant was running her center in accordance with the provisions of law. Respondent No.2 i.e. original complainant visited Sonography Center/Hospital of the applicant. He carried out inspection of the Center. The entire record was made available to him. However, he seized 8 “F” forms. It is alleged that the said forms were not filled up completely. Respondent No.2 seized Sonography machine and issued show-cause notice to the applicant. The applicant replied the same. It is contended that respondent No.2 filed complaint before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Parli-Vaijnath, wherein the Trial Court issued process against the applicant. It is contended that the seized Form “F” were
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.