Yuvraj Ananda Kamble vs State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Bom) 365

R.D.DHANUKA, ABHAY AHUJA
Yuvraj Ananda Kamble – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Narendra V. Bandiwadekar with Mr. Vinayak Kumbhar and Mr. Ajinkya Navale i/b Mrs. Ashwini Navjyot Bandiwadekar, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikas M. Mali, Mr. S.B.Kalel, Ms. Sushma S. Bhende, Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, adv

JUDGMENT :

ABHAY AHUJA, J

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel for Respondents in all the petitions waive service.

2. By consent of learned counsel for the parties, all these petitions are heard finally.

3. By these petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the employee-Petitioners are aggrieved by the orders rejecting the proposals for the grant of approval pursuant to the transfers of the employees from unaided to aided schools, in view of Government Resolutions dated 12th February 2015 and 23rd October 2013 (the “GRs”).

4. For the sake of convenience the relevant facts in respect of the employee-Petitioners in the above petitions as submitted by counsel for the Petitioners, are set forth as under:-

Sr. No	Writ Petition	Name of Petitioner	Post	Unaided Appointment	Unaided Approval	Date of Transfer	Impugned Order
1.	5806/2018	Yuvraj Ananda Kamble	Peon	16.6.2007	18.10.2010	1.10.2017	22.3.2018
2.	5811/2018	Ashok Shivaji Fasake	Junior Clerk	9.8.2004	24.7.2006	1.10.2017	22.3.2018

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Bom) 365

R.D.DHANUKA, ABHAY AHUJAYuvraj Ananda Kamble – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra – Respondent

R.D.DHANUKA, ABHAY AHUJA
Yuvraj Ananda Kamble – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent