IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
K.R. Shriram, Abhay Ahuja, JJ.
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority a public institution owned by and subject to the supervision of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi Having its office at 211, Corniche, PO Box 3600, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates – Petitioner
Versus
Authority for Advance Ruling, (Income Tax), Mumbai Bench and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 770 & 709 of 2021
Decided On : 28-10-2021
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 5 (2), 9 (1) (i), 61, 161 and 245-O - Indian Trust Act, 1882 - Section 3 - Registration Act, 1908 - India-United Arab Emirates - Article 4 (2) (d) and 24 - Treaty - Revocable Transfer of Assets - Irrevocable trust and revocable trust - Double Taxation - Deed of Settlement - Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement - Abu Dhabi Investment Authority - Liability of representative assessee - Whether the capital contribution made / proposed to be made / transferred by ADIA to Green Maiden A 2013 Trust be treated as a revocable transfer for the purpose of Section 63 of the Act.
Finding of the court : A “settlement” or a “trust” are instances of what amount to transfer. So long as the settlor has a right to reassume power over the assets settled, the same would amount to revocable transfer - income that accrues to the trust would not be chargeable to tax in India either by virtue of application of Section 61 read with Section 63 or on an application of Section 161 of the Act conjointly with the provisions of Article 24 of the India-UAE DTAA - Once again, ADIA is the sole beneficiary of the trust, the income assessed in hands of the trustee will take colour of that of ADIA’s income and thereby, benefit of India-UAE DTAA must be granted - settlor cannot be a sole beneficiary, as ADIA was settlor as well as sole beneficiary, first of all the Act does not make any such provision. Secondly, there is no provision under the Indian Trust Act also which debars the settlor from being beneficiary - AR while expressing its view that India has not ratified Hague Convention on the law applicable to trust has overlooked the fact that ADIA is not seeking to apply Foreign Law to India but is merely seeking an application of Section 61 which in no manner excludes, from it applicability, a trust settled outside India - Steps taken in furtherance of Ruling order passed therein are also quashed and set aside.
Result : Petitions disposed
JUDGMENT :
K. R. SHRIRAM, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard and disposed at the admission stage itself with the consent of the counsel.
2. In both the petitions, a common ruling dated 18th March 2020 passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling (Income Tax) (hereinafter referred to as AAR) is impugned. Hence both the petitions are taken up together. Shri Kotangle did not wish to file any reply since according to him only questions of law were involved. We shall take Writ Petition No.770 of 2021 filed by Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (hereinafter referred to as ADIA) as lead petition.
3. ADIA is a public institution owned by and subject to the supervision of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Article 4 (2) (d) of the India-United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “India-UAE DTAA”) expressly provides that ADIA is a resident of UAE for the purposes of Article 4 thereof and, accordingly, ADIA is entitled to invoke the beneficial provisions of the India-UAE DTAA for the purpose of determining its tax liability in India. ADIA files its return of income (hereinafter referred to as “ROI”) in India, disclosing therein income that falls within the scope of Section 5 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) but in view of the exemption available in terms of the India-UAE DTAA, reports NIL taxable income in the ROI. ADIA does not have any permanent establishment/fixed place of business or any other form of presence in India and does not have any business connection/operations in India. AAR is a statutory authority constituted under Section 245-O of the Act to give a ruling on any question raised in respect of any transaction which has been undertaken or is proposed to be undertaken by a non-resident applicant or the tax liability of a non-resident arising out of a transaction which has been undertaken or is proposed to be undertaken by a resident applicant with such non-resident or whether an arrangement, which is proposed to be undertaken by any person, being a resident or a non-resident, is an impermissible avoidance agreement as referred to in Chapter X-A. The ruling/order on the questions raised before AAR is binding only upon applicant who sought the answer and the revenue authority assessing such applicant but the same has a persuasive value insofar as other assessees are concerned.
4. ADIA is challenging the order/ruling dated 18th March 2020 passed by AAR in case of ADIA as well as Equity Trust (Jersey) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ETL) as the trustee, which is petitioner in Writ Petition No.709 of 2021, denying ADIA the benefit of India-UAE DTAA read with relevant provisions of the Act in respect of the income accruing on the investments made or proposed to be made by Green Maiden A 2013 Trust (hereinafter referred to as the Trust), which was established by ADIA and ETL as settlor and trustee, respectively. The trust is settled by ADIA in Jersey. Under the Deed of Settlement dated 22nd July 2013 (the Deed of Settlement), the trust is being set up by and for the benefit of ADIA who is, apart from being the settlor, also the sole beneficiary of the trust. This trust is a revocable and determinable trust.
5. The following provisions of the Deed of Settlement are relevant:
(ccc) “Term” shall mean the term of the Trust, which shall continue until the later of :
(i) 8 (eight) years from the date of Closing. By the end of the 7th (seventh) year, the Trustee may (on the request of the Investment Manager) seek a 1 (one) year extension for liquidation of the Trust and such extension shall be subject to the consent of the Sole Beneficiary; and
(ii) the date on which the remaining Receipts in the Trust Fund are distributed to the Sole Beneficiary after payment and discharge of all accrued expenses (including Operating Expenses), fees and liabilities of the Trust.
(eee) “Trust” shall have the meaning p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.