M.S.SONAK, BHARATI H.DANGRE
Milind Mamlekar – Appellant
Versus
Goa University – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Bharati H. Dangre, J.
“The meaning and content of the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution of India are of sufficient amplitude to compass all the facets of gender equality”.
Lordship Justice J.S. Verma while delivering the judgment in the Vishaka and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 SCC 241 expressed above.
2. Sexual harassment results in violation of the fundamental rights of the woman to equality as enshrined in the Constitution and also her right to live with dignity guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Government of India has enacted The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The said enactment is an extension of the guidelines issued by the Apex Court in case of Vishaka and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) in the year 1997, by acknowledging sexual harassment at workplace as human right violation. The Act is reflective of the commitment of the Government to the ratification of convention on elimination of all forms of discrimination against woman and on enactment of the said statute India has become part of select group of countries who have prohibited sexual harassment at work plac
Vishaka and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan
Indian Oil Corporation and Anr. vs. Ashok Kumar Arora
Corporation of City of Nagpur and Anr. vs. Ramachandra
B.C. Chaturvedi vs. Union of India and other
Lalit Popli vs. Canara Bank and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.