S.C.GUPTE, SURENDRA P.TAVADE
Sandhya D/o. Balkrushna Teli – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.
Rule.
2. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of both counsel. The petition is heard finally.
3. The petitioners seek direction against respondent No.2-Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad to grant approval to appoint all petitioners on aided post of Assistant Teacher from their respective dates i.e. 15-6-2018, 15-6-2018, 1-10-2016, 15-6-2018 and 13-8-2018 on 100% grant-in-aid in respondent Nos. 4 and 5 Schools instead of Shikshan Sevak on 20% grant-in-aid. They also seek directions to release their arrears of salary.
4. Petitioners were initially appointed as Assistant Teachers on 1-2-2013 on unaided division of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 by following due procedure and against clear and vacant sanctioned posts. The appointments of petitioners were approved by respondent No. 2 by an order dated 14-8-2013 respectively. It is contended that five posts of Assistant Teacher on 100% aided basis in the establishment of respondent No. 4 had became vacant on account of retirement or superannuation of earlier permanent teachers working on the said posts. On considering the seniority of petitioners on unaided posts, respondent No. 3 transferred petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.