SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 452

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
K.K. TATED, R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.
Macrotech Developers Ltd., Mumbai and another - Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others - Respondents
W.P. (St.) No. 93915 of 2020
Decided On : 22-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Amogh Singh with Jeet Gandhi instructed by D.P. Singh.
For the State : P.P. Kakade, Government Pleader with K.S. Thorat AGP.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the Order dated 29th August, 2020 and subsequent orders, and that the respondents had arbitrarily levied higher stamp duty rates, contrary to the August 2020 Notification and the ITP Regulations.

Headnote:

Stamp Duty - Integrated Township Project - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Regulation 13.3 of the ITP Regulations - Order dated 29th August, 2020 - Amendment Order dated 21st December, 2020

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought directions against the respondents to grant them the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in payment of stamp duty in addition to the concession in stamp duty provided for in the Regulations for development of Integrated Township Project (ITP). The respondents had been arbitrarily levying higher stamp duty rates, contrary to the August 2020 Notification and the ITP Regulations.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the Order dated 29th August, 2020 and subsequent orders granting concession in payment of stamp duty on the instrument of conveyance or agreement to sell of any immovable property in addition to the benefits already granted as per the ITP Regulations.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the Order dated 29th August, 2020 and subsequent orders, and whether the respondents had arbitrarily levied higher stamp duty rates.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the Order dated 29th August, 2020 and subsequent orders, and that the respondents had arbitrarily levied higher stamp duty rates, contrary to the August 2020 Notification and the ITP Regulations.

Final Decision: The court declared that the petitioners were entitled to the benefits of the Order dated 29th August, 2020 and subsequent orders granting concession in payment of stamp duty on the instrument of conveyance or agreement to sell of any immovable property in addition to the benefits already granted as per the ITP Regulations. The respondents were directed to refund any excess stamp duty levied and recovered from the petitioners or their purchasers without giving the benefit of the Order dated 29th August, 2020 and the benefit of the Integrated Township project.

ORDER :

R.I. CHAGLA, J.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent.

2. The petitioners have filed this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions against the respondents to grant the petitioners the benefit of the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 in payment of stamp duty in addition to the concession in stamp duty provided for in the Regulations for development of Integrated Township Project (for short “the said ITP Regulation”) which Regulations, appended to the Government Notification dated 8th March, 2019, have been framed by the Government exercising powers under section 37(1AA) (c) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short “MR and TP”).

3. The petitioners are engaged in the business of real estate and carry out development of various projects at Mumbai, Thane, Kalyan and Bhiwandi including the lands that have been notified as the Integrated Township Projects (ITPs) situated at Kalyan and Bhiwandi. The respondent No. 1 is the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest. The respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are the joint Sub-Registrars of Kalyan and Bhiwandi, Registration Offices within District Thane and performing the duties and responsibilities under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as also under the Registration Act, 1908. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are instrumentalities of the State for the purposes of Article 12 of the Constitution of India and amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court.

4. The respondent No. 1 State had issued an order bearing No. Mudrank 2006/UOR.53/CR 536/M-1 dated 15th January, 2008. By this order the stamp duty for agreements and conveyances were reduced by 50% in Special Township Projects (for short “STP”).

5. The Government of Maharashtra, Urban Development Department issued a Notification bearing No. TPS-1816/CR-368/16/Part-1/DP-ITP/UD-13 dated 8th March, 2019. By this Notification, Regulations for development of the said ITPs were notified. By these Regulations, the Government had given certain concessions/incentives for development of the said ITPs. One such concession was with respect to the 50% of the stamp duty as otherwise required to be paid under the Mumbai Stamp Act. The said ITP Regulations were brought into force by repealing all the prior Regulations. The STP’s had earlier been replaced by the said ITP by an amendment made in the MR and TP Act, 1966 vide Maharashtra Act, 43 of 2014, with effect from 22nd April, 2015. The said ITP Regulations have been approved by the cabinet and have received the assent of the Governor of the State of Maharashtra.

6. The petitioners have stated that they had registered their project “Kunal Espiree – Phase III under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 on 1st August, 2017. They have stated that their project falls under the said ITP Regulations. Accordingly, the petitioners are claiming concession of 50% of stamp duty under Regulation 13.3 of the said ITP Regulations.

7. It has been stated in the Petition that in and around March, 2020 on account of outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Government of India took effective measures to prevent the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. The measures taken included nationwide lock down which extended till 30th June, 2020. The Government of India and the Reserve Bank of India formulated financial relief measures, so as to reduce the financial burden that resulted from the nationwide lock down with a view to encourage people to buy houses and alleviate the hardships faced by the real estate industry, the Revenue and Forest Department issued an Order dated 29th August, 2020 granting concession in payment of stamp duty. By the said Order, the stamp duty was reduced by 2% for the State of Maharashtra (excluding Mumbai) for the period from 1st September, 2020 to 31st December, 2020 and by 1.5% for the Sta

                              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                              1
                              2
                              3
                              4
                              5
                              6
                              7
                              8
                              9
                              10
                              11
                              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                              supreme today icon
                              logo-black

                              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                              Please visit our Training & Support
                              Center or Contact Us for assistance

                              qr

                              Scan Me!

                              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                              whatsapp-icon Back to top