ROHIT B.DEO
DEEPAK SUNDARLAL MURARKA – Appellant
Versus
HARJIMAL ONKARMAL (M/S) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. U. J. Deshpande, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. M.G. Sarda, the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. M.K. Pathan, the learned APP for respondent 4/State.
2. The petitioner is assailing the judgment dated 4-10-2017, rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Akola in Criminal Appeal 121/2016, whereby, in purported exercise of power under Rule 154(2) of the Petroleum Rules, 2002 (“Rules”), the appeal preferred by respondents 1 to 3, challenging the communication dated 13-6-2016, issued by the District Magistrate, Akola, informing the Joint Chief Controller of Explosives that no ‘no objection certificate’ (“NOC”) was issued to the petroleum service station of M/s. Harjimal Onkarmal – a partnership firm on plot 33/1, sheet 40-A of Akola, was allowed.
3. The petitioner contends that respondent 1, which is a registered partnership firm, is operating a petrol pump at Akola without valid NOC since 1-9-1961. The contention is premised on the assertion that the NOC was initially issued in the name of individual Mr. Harjimal Onkarmal on 16-4-1959. Mr. Harjimal Onkarmal expired on 26-5-1959 and the respondents 2 and 3 Mr. Mayur Murarka and Mr. Gov
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.