V.G.BISHT
Alnesh Akil Somji – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present application has been moved by the applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Crime No. 97 of 2021 registered with Deccan Police Station, Pune City for offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (the IPC).
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune rejected the anticipatory bail application of the applicant on the ground of maintainability by relying on the judgment given in Sunil Kallani V/s. State of Rajasthan, 2021 SCC OnLine Raj 1654 and as also the judgment passed in case of Narinderjit Singh Sahni and Another Versus Union of India and Others, (2002) 2 Supreme Court Cases 210. According to learned Counsel, the learned Additional Sessions Judge erred in giving a restrictive interpretation to the scope of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (for short, “the Cr.PC.”). Learned counsel also invited my attention to the various observations made in the case of Sushila A Aggarwal and others Versus State (NCT of Delhi) and Another, (2020) 5 Supreme Court Cases 1 and would submit that the impugned order being bad in law, same is liable to b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.