SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 521

S.S.SHINDE, SURENDRA P.TAVADE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Hundraj Rupija – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.S. Hulke, APP
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikas B. Shivarkar

JUDGEMENT :

S.S. SHINDE, J.

1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune dated 20th December, 2002, in Sessions Case No.192 of 2001, thereby acquitting the Respondents – accused for the charges under sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 37(1), 135 of the Bombay Police Act.

2. The prosecution case in brief is as under:

The complainant Ramesh Belaram Ahuja was running a lottery centre at Pune. On 2.2.2001, in the evening at 4.30pm, 10 to 15 persons alongwith accused No.1 Suresh Rupija came to his shop to collect Gujarat Earthquake Relief Fund. At that time, some altercation took place between the complainant and accused No.1 Suresh and complainant uttered the words addressing the accused ‘not to bark like a dog’. Therefore, accused Suresh asked his companions not to take contribution from the complainant and accordingly, they went away.

Thereafter, on 15.2.2001, at about 9.30pm, the complainant after closing his shop, was proceeding towards his house on his motor cycle on Tilak Road when near a furniture shop, a rickshaw came from behind and someone from that rickshaw, entangled a stick in the front whe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top