SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 150

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G.S.PATEL, MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.
Hotel & Restaurant Association (Western India) and Others – Appellants
Versus
Commissioner, State Excise, Maharashtra and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 2873 of 2021 With Writ Petition No. 1980 of 2021
Decided on : 29-03-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr Viraag Tulzapurkar, Mr Ramesh Soni, Mr Sameer Pandit with Ms Krina Gandhi i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co. Mr Ramesh Soni, with Mr Sameer Pandit with Ms Krina Gandhi, i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co.
For the Respondent:- Mr Ashutosh A Kumbhakoni, Advocate General, with Mr Akshay Shinde, “B” Panel Counsel, Mr Milind More Addl GP, Mr Manoj Badgujar, AGP.

Point of Lw: Petitioners cannot claim to have been unaware of the possibility of them being in default. This is the price of unwise gambling on litigation.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 8 and 14 - Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Section 167 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 - Maharashtra Foreign Liquor Rules 1953 - Rule 45 - Extension or an instalment payment facility - Demanded of reduction - Foreign liquor - Vending of foreign liquor is controlled by licenses under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 in Form FL-III, renewable annually. Foreign liquor is sold at Petitioners’ hotels - Petitioners are unwilling to pay license renewal fees prescribed by State Government. They have paid 50% of revised fees - They are unwilling to pay more - They demand concessions - They complain of discrimination at hands of Respondents - Ad-interim relief we only direct that in event members of Petitioner Association deposit 50% of license fees in this Court within one week from today - Court record statement of learned Senior Counsel for Petitioners that list of members of Petitioner’s Association shall be filed - list of members who have deposited 50% of license fees in this Court shall be communicated by the Advocate of Petitioners to office of the Govt. Pleader with proof of payment.

Finding of the Court:

Petitions are entirely without merit express our gravest displeasure at the manner in which they were pressed, knowing full-well of the pressures on this Court with a massive increase in our roster caseloads - There are hundreds of Petitions by individuals, societies and so on pending - They have waited their turn - Their cases are now delayed by this self-indulgent and self-serving foreign liquor vending hotels, in whose petition there is not a shred of merit, and some of whose contentions border on the outrageous - Relevant material has been suppressed from Petition, including the various concessions granted by State Government and fact of number of similarly placed licensees who have paid.

Result: Interim Applications are disposed of

JUDGMENT :

GS Patel, J:

1. Eight of the ten Petitioners in Writ Petition No 2873 of 2021 and the first petitioner in Writ Petition No 1980 of 2021 are associations of hotels; the others are individual members of one or the other of these associations. We heard these two petitions along with Writ Petitions (L) No 7126 of 2022 and Writ Petition (L) No 7848 of 2022, both filed in March 2022, on 25th March 2022. All petitioners were represented by common attorneys and by a single senior counsel, Mr Tulzapurkar. On 25th March 2022, after the hearing concluded, we reserved judgment and posted the matters for pronouncement on 30th March 2022 - in our anticipation then the earliest possible date by which the judgment could be dictated, transcribed and corrected. As it happens, our draft was ready by the evening of 28th March 2022. That evening, we received a praecipe seeking a listing today, 29th March 2022, saying that the Petitioners in the two 2022 Writ Petitions sought to unconditionally withdraw them. We have listed all four petitions at 10:30 am on the supplementary board today. By a separate order, we have permitted the withdrawal of the two 2022 petitions. We also advance the date for pronouncement of judgment in the two 2021 Petition. No one can object to a judgment being pronounced earlier rather than later.

2. Vending of foreign liquor is controlled by licenses under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 in Form FL-III, renewable annually. Foreign liquor is sold at the Petitioners’ hotels. The Petitioners are unwilling to pay the license renewal fees prescribed by the State Government. They have paid 50% of the revised fees for 2021-2022. They are unwilling to pay more. They demand concessions. They complain of discrimination at the hands of the Respondents.

3. Under Rule 45 of the Maharashtra Foreign Liquor Rules 1953 (“the MFL Rules”) and Rules 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Potable Liquor (Periodicity and Fees for Grant, Renewal or Continuance of a Licenses) Rules 1996 (“the Periodicity Rules”), a FL-III license is valid from 1st April to 31st March. Rule 3 of the Periodicity Rules requires that revised license fees be notified in the Official Gazette.

4. On 28th January 2021, Respondent No. 1 issued the impugned notification prescribing the license fees for 2021-2022, Petition, Exhibit F, p. 44. The 2022 Writ Petitions impugned an identical notification of 28th January 2022. The Petitioners made two representations on 25th March 2021 and 27th March 2021 against this notification. The Petitioners sought a time-extension or an instalment payment facility. They also demanded a reduction because they were being allowed to operate only at 50% (because of the Covid-19 pandemic restrictions). They also sought that those who had already paid 100% for the previous year should be allowed to ‘adjust’ 50% for the 2021-2022 period.

5. The Petitioners filed this Petition on 28th April 2021. On 6th May 2021, this Court granted ad-interim relief in the following terms:

“The Writ Petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:

a. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass a writ, order and direction quashing and setting aside the Notification dated January 28, 2021 issued by the Respondent No. 1 b. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass a writ, order and direction directing the Respondent No. 1 to treat the commencement date of the license period for FL-III license for Financial Year 2021- 22 as the date on which restrictions imposed on the operations of the place of business of FL-III licenses in the State of Maharashtra are lifted and FL-III licenses are permitted to carry on their business as per the hours and conditions set out in the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and Rules made thereunder;

(c) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass a writ, order and declaration that the outbreak of COVID-19 and the ensuing restriction on operation of FL-III licenses are relevant facts to determining the quantum of license fees for FL-III licenses f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top