SUNIL B.SHUKRE, G.A.SANAP
Sayyad Alfiya Fatima Ikhlas – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sunil B. Shukre, J.
1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
2. Heard Mr. Bansode, learned Counsel for the petitioners extensively.
3. The petitioners are the students who have been admitted to B.H.M.S Course on 13th October, 2019 conducted by three different Colleges which are respondents No.8, 10 and 12.
4. The petitioners, now, by this petition have sought direction to respondent No.6 to grant forthwith eligibility to the admissions of the petitioners taking into consideration that Admissions Regulating Authority has already regularized the admission of all the petitioners vide it’s order dated 13th October, 2021.
5. Before we deal with the order dated 13th October, 2021 passed by the respondent No.4 - Admissions Regulating Authority, we must state it here that it is not in dispute that as per the minimum eligibility criteria, students desirous of taking admission to B.H.M.S Course must have secured not less than 50 percentile of marks at NEET and the percentile secured by each and every petitioner, there are 13 number of petitioners, is below 50. In other words, as per the minimum eligibility criteria of percentile, none of the petitioners was and is eligible to secure
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.