IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, GOA BENCH
M.S. SONAK, R.N. LADDHA, JJ.
Antonio Joao Bosco Lobo S/o Jose Leles Lobo – Appellant
Versus
The State of Goa – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 265 of 2015
Decided On : 01-02-2022
Code of Comunidades - Legislative Amendments - Article 652 - Article 41 - [Goa Daman and Diu Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1997, 2001, Second Amendment Act, 2001] - The court declined to strike down the legislative amendments to the Code of Comunidades due to lack of proper pleadings on how these legislative measures contravene the Constitution or are beyond the legislative competence of the State. The court also refused to entertain the challenge to the constitutional validity of the amended Article 41 of the Code of Comunidades due to absence of a live lis and proper pleadings. However, the court directed the concerned authorities to implement the provisions of Article 652 of the Code of Comunidades.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioners sought to strike down various legislative amendments to the Code of Comunidades and to implement the provisions of Article 652 of the Code of Comunidades. The court found the pleadings to be sketchy and declined to entertain the challenges to the constitutional validity of the amendments and the amended Article 41 due to absence of proper pleadings and a live lis.
Finding of the Court:
The court declined to strike down the legislative amendments to the Code of Comunidades and the amended Article 41 due to lack of proper pleadings and a live lis. However, the court directed the concerned authorities to implement the provisions of Article 652 of the Code of Comunidades.
Issues: Lack of proper pleadings, absence of a live lis, and compliance with the provisions of Article 652 of the Code of Comunidades.
Ratio Decidendi: The court declined to entertain the challenges to the constitutional validity of the legislative amendments and the amended Article 41 due to lack of proper pleadings and a live lis. However, the court directed the concerned authorities to implement the provisions of Article 652 of the Code of Comunidades.
Final Decision: The court declined to strike down the legislative amendments to the Code of Comunidades and the amended Article 41, but directed the concerned authorities to implement the provisions of Article 652 of the Code of Comunidades.
JUDGMENT :
M.S. SONAK, J.
1. Heard Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias for the Petitioners, Mr. D. Pangam learned Advocate General who appears along with Mr. Deep Shirodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondents No. 1 and 2 and Mr. Y.V. Nadkarni for Respondent No. 3.
2. The Petitioners, who claim to be the Gaunkars/Jonoeiros/Jonkars and legitimate Components of the Comunidade of Serula, have instituted this Petition, seeking the following reliefs:
(b) For a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order thereby directing the Respondents no. 1 to forthwith comply with and implement the provisions of Article 652 of the Code of Comunidades.
(c) For such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(d) For an appropriate writ, order or direction thereby quashing and striking down the Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.04.1961 (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 (Ordinance No. 9/15).”
3. The perusal of Annexure “D” collectively referred to in the index as appearing on pages 204-213, indicates that there is no list as such of the amendments to the Code of Comunidades which are sought to be struck down. However, on Pages 181-A, we find the following list:
2. The Goa Daman and Diu Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 1985.
3. The Goa Daman and Diu Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 1986.
4. The Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 1988.
5. The Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 1993.
6. The Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 1995.
7. The Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 1996.
8. The Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 1997.
9. The Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Amendment) Act, 2001.
10. The Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated 15.4.1961 (Second Amendment) Act, 2001.”
4. Similarly, prayer clause (d), seeks a writ to strike down Ordinance No. 9/2015. This ordinance no longer survives since the Legislative Assembly enacted a law in terms of what was provided by the ordinance. There is no challenge to such law in the Petition.
5. The pleadings in this writ petition in the context of a challenge to the validity of the various legislative amendments to the Code of Comunidades are also quite sketchy. The Petitioners have not pleaded in precise terms how according to them, the several amendments which they have challenged, contravene Part III of the Constitution or are beyond the legislative competence of the State. In the absence of proper pleadings, we do not think that it would be appropriate for us to entertain the challenges to the constitutional validity of the several amendments to the Code of Comunidades.
6. Mr. Costa Frias, however, referred to the provisions of Article 652 of the Code of Comunidades, which read as follows:
1. In the first fortnight of November, the Governor-General shall appoint a commission comprising of five members chosen from among the members of the managing committee of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.