SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, ABHAY AHUJA
Bhupendra Harilal Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner is stated to be an individual, his income being profits from a partnership firm, income from house property, interest, dividend and income from dealing in shares and derivatives.
2. Petitioner filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015- 16 on 29th September 2015 declaring a total income of Rs.1,52,19,010/-. The case was picked up for scrutiny assessment and an order dated 27th December, 2017 was passed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("Income Tax Act") wherein an addition of Rs.84,25,075/- was made under Section 68 and an addition of Rs.11,75,901/- was made under Section 69C of the Income-tax Act. It appears that additions were made by the Assessing Officer on the basis that petitioner had booked artificial long term capital gains of Rs.5,73,23,123/- and claimed exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act thereon by selling shares of M/s. Lifeline Drugs and Pharma Limited ("Lifeline Drugs") for a total consideration of Rs.5,87,95,055/-. The case of the Assessing Officer was that the price of this share was artificially rigged by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.