R.D.DHANUKA, V.G.BISHT
Arnav Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Iosis Spa & Wellness Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.D.Dhanuka, J. - By this appeal filed under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the Arbitration Act") the appellant (original respondent) has impugned the order dated 30th July, 2020 and 26th October, 2020 passed by the learned Single Judge thereby granting ad-interim measures in favour of the respondent (original petitioner) under section 9 of the Arbitration Act. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this appeal are as under.
2. It was the case of the respondent that the respondent is engaged in the business of running wellness centers under the brand name and trademark of "IOSIS". The Founder and Managing Director of the respondent has specialized in cosmetology and wellness from London Beauty School (U.K.), beauty and cosmetology at Christine Valmy (U.S.) etc. The respondent has knowledge of running beauty salon, slimming, skincare centers and spas in India.
3. It was the case of the respondent that the appellant approached the respondent for franchise of the respondent in the month of December, 2018. Various correspondences were exchanged between the parties through emails. The respondent issued a Letter of Intent on 5th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.