SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1021

K.R.SHRIRAM
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Dada Aher – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.M. Deshmukh, Advocate, Spenta Havewala, Advocate

JUDGMENT

K R Shriram, J. - This is an appeal impugning an order and judgment dated 31st March 2006 passed by the 5th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, acquitting respondent (accused) of offences punishable under Section 498(A) (Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty) read with Section 306 (Abetment of suicide) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

2. On 16th March 2021 since nobody appeared for respondent, this Court appointed Ms. Spenta Havewala, Advocate to represent respondent and assist the Court. Before I proceed with the case, I must express my appreciation for the assistance rendered and endeavour put forth by Ms. Havewala, Advocate.

3. It is prosecution's case that accused was married to one Malti on or about 2nd May 1985. They had three children, a daughter by name Vidula, who is DW-2 and two sons. According to prosecution, the initial 5 to 6 years accused and Malti lived happily but thereafter, accused started tormenting Malti and harassing her by making demand for purchasing a house. It seems accused and his relatives used to allege that sufficient dowry was not brought by Malti. Accused used to also assault Malti. Because of this constant har

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top