Back
R.D.DHANUKA, V.G.BISHT
Mahendra Devilal Jain – Appellant
Versus
National (india) Contractors And Engineers – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction disputes related to tenancy and arbitration. (Para 1 , 2 , 8 , 12 , 76 , 138) |
| 2. tenant's rights and obligations in redevelopment agreements. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 86) |
| 3. liabilities of tenants and landlords under renovation agreements. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 15) |
| 4. conditions of tenancy continuation after redevelopment. (Para 13 , 18 , 38 , 87) |
| 5. legal definitions of landlord, tenant, and the significance in contract enforcement. (Para 71 , 72 , 81 , 82 , 113) |
JUDGMENT
R.D. Dhanuka, J. - By these Appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, "The Arbitration Act'), the appellants (original petitioners) have impugned the order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Arbitration Petitions filed by the appellants under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act on the ground of jurisdiction.
2. By consent of parties, this batch of Appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. The parties have addressed this Court in Commercial Appeal (L) No. 666 of 2021 as a lead matter and have agreed that the other matters being identical to Commercial Appeal (L) No. 666 of 2021, the decision of this Cour
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
