SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 983

N.J.JAMADAR
Ashok – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.A. Dhengle, Advocate, S.A. Dhengle, Advocate, R.D. Sanap, Advocate, S.S. Pawar, Advocate, S.A. Nagargoje, Advocate

JUDGMENT

N J Jamadar, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the Counsels for the parties, heard finally at the stage of admission.

2. The challenge in this petition is to the judgment and order dated 29th of April 2015 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Solapur, in Appeal No. 80 of 2014, whereby the appeal, preferred by the appellant-petitioner against termination of his service by respondent No.4-management, came to be dismissed.

3. The background facts, leading to this petition, can be stated, in brief, as under:

(i) The respondent No.4 runs a school, namely, Vasant Vidyalaya, at Pimpalgaon (Ko) Taluka Washi Dist. Osmanabad. Pursuant to approval granted by the respondent No.3 - the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad, the respondent No.4 had published an advertisement inviting applications for the post of Shikshan Sevaks, on 24th of December 2011. The petitioner, being duly qualified, had applied for the post of Shikshan Sevak from the Open Category. After appraisal of the qualification and credentials as well as performance in the interview, the petitioner came to be appointed as a Shikshan Sevak, by order dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top