SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 972

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S.Karnik, J.
Gera Development Pvt.ltd - Appellant
Versus
Geras Greensville Trinity Towers Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 753 of 2020
Decided On : 31-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
Dorman J.Dalal, Advocate, P.K.Dhakephalkar, Advocate, Rohan Surve, Advocate, S.D.Rayrikar, Advocate

The society is entitled to deemed conveyance under the provisions of MOFA.

Headnote:

Deemed Conveyance - Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963 (MOFA) - The court examines the agreement and the provisions of MOFA and concludes that the society is entitled to deemed conveyance. The court also notes that if the petitioners have any disputes, they can file a substantive suit before a civil court.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenge an order granting deemed conveyance to the respondent society under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963 (MOFA). The petitioners argue that the conveyance has been granted contrary to the agreement entered into with the flat purchasers. The respondent society argues that the agreement is void and contrary to the provisions of MOFA. The court examines the agreement and the provisions of MOFA and concludes that the society is entitled to deemed conveyance. The court also notes that if the petitioners have any disputes, they can file a substantive suit before a civil court. The court rejects the petition and allows the petitioners to file a substantive suit for adjudication of title and appropriate reliefs. The ad-interim relief granted by the court is continued for a period of 8 weeks.

Finding of the Court:

The court examines the agreement and the provisions of MOFA and concludes that the society is entitled to deemed conveyance. The court also notes that if the petitioners have any disputes, they can file a substantive suit before a civil court.

Ratio Decidendi: The society is entitled to deemed conveyance under the provisions of MOFA. The petitioners can file a substantive suit before a civil court to resolve any disputes.

Result: The petition is rejected. The ad-interim relief granted by the court is continued for a period of 8 weeks.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners. The order under challenge in this Petition is an order granting deemed conveyance in favour of Respondent No.1 - Society under the provisions of Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963 (for short 'MOFA'). It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners that deemed conveyance has been granted contrary to the agreement entered into with the fat purchasers. One such agreement dated 15/02/2014 is at page 365 of the paperbook. He relied upon clause 12.1 of the agreement which reads thus :

"12.1 After the development of the Entire Land is completed and after the said Ultimate/Apex Body is formed and registered and after all the different premises in the said building/s have been sold and disposed-of by the Developer and after the Developer has received all dues payable by the allottees of different/various premises in the said building/s to the Developer, the final Transfer Deeds of the said land and/or other lands and the building/s constructed thereon shall be executed within 9 months thereafter by the Developer, the Consenting Party and the Confirming Party in favor of such Ultimate/Apex Body and such Transfer Deeds shall be in the form as may be prepared by the Advocates of the Developer"

2. Placing reliance on the said clause, learned Counsel for the Petitioners contended that in terms of the provisions of the MOFA, full disclosures have been made under the said agreement. He submits that the statutory and mandatory provisions of MOFA have been duly complied with. It is his submission that the agreement, particularly clause 12.1 contemplates the formation & registration of federal body after the development of the entire land is completed. According to him, even a time limit of 9 months is stipulated in clause 12.1. The agreement has been duly signed by fat purchasers and therefore the Petitioners - developer as well as the fat purchasers are bound by clause 12.1 of the agreement. In his submission none of the provisions of MOFA are violated and clause 12.1 cannot be said to be contrary to any of the provisions of MOFA as the Petitioners are still bound to execute the concerned transfer deeds of the said land in terms of clause 12.1 in favour of the Ultimate/Apex body. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Society has been granted area more than what they are entitled to under fat purchasers agreement by virtue of deemed conveyance. Even this aspect, according to him, has not been considered by the Competent Authority.

3. Learned Senior Advocate for the Respondent - Society on the other hand extensively relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jayantilal Investments Vs. Madhuvihar Co-op. Housing Society and ors. (2007) 9 Supreme Court Cases 220. He submits that agreement under MOFA has been entered into and that clause 12.1 of the said agreement is completely void and contrary to the mandate of the provisions of the MOFA. It is his submission that the Society has already been formed and therefore in terms of the provisions of the MOFA, Society is entitled to get the deemed conveyance in their favour. According to him, 7 buildings are constructed on 6 Hector and 73 R of land.

4. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties. I have gone through clause 12.1 of the agreement. The agreement has been entered into under the provisions of the MOFA between the Petitioners - developer and fat purchasers.

In terms of provisions of the Co-operative Societies Act, the Society has been duly registered. In the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Jayantilal Investments (supra) and having regard to the provisions of the MOFA, the Society is entitled to deemed conveyance.

Even under clause 12.1 of the said agreement, it was for the developer to take steps to form an Ultimate/ Apex body whereupon the transfer deeds have to be executed in f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top