SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 953

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Ravindra V Ghuge, B.U. Debadwar, JJ.
Nikhil - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 2203 of 2020
Decided On : 24-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
Sushant C Yeramwar, Advocate, D.G. Nagode, Advocate, A.P. Bhandari, Advocate, D.S. Bagul, Advocate, Dnyaneshwar Ekhande, Advocate

Candidates must possess all required documents, including the OBC certificate, on the date of application to be considered eligible for the dealership, as per the Brochure Clause 4(vi)(b).

Headnote:

Eligibility Criteria - Retail Outlet Dealership - Brochure Clause 4(vi)(b) - OBC Certificate - Possession of Documents - Ineligibility Determination

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to quash a communication rejecting his eligibility for a retail outlet dealership due to missing documents, including an OBC certificate, required by the Brochure Clause 4(vi)(b). The court had granted ad-interim protection, preventing the final allotment order to another candidate.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner did not possess the required documents, including the OBC certificate, on the cut-off date for application, rendering him ineligible for the dealership. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the company's determination of ineligibility.

Issues: The main issue was the petitioner's eligibility for the retail outlet dealership based on possession of required documents, including the OBC certificate, as per the Brochure Clause 4(vi)(b).

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that candidates must possess all required documents, including the OBC certificate, on the date of application to be considered eligible for the dealership, as per the Brochure Clause 4(vi)(b).

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, discharged the rule, and rejected the request for continuing the ad-interim order, emphasizing the public benefit of the dealership allotment.

JUDGMENT

Ravindra V. Ghuge, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.

2. The petitioner has put forth prayer clause (B) and (C) as under :

"B) To quash and set aside letter dated 10.01.2020 and direct the respondents to grant retail outlet dealership at location No.2006 in Dhule District pursuance to advertisement dated 25.11.2018 and selection dated 27.06.2019 by issuing appropriate writ, orders or direction as the case may be.

C) To grant stay to letter dated 10.01.2020 and direct the respondents to grant retail outlet dealership at location No.2006 in Dhule District pursuance to advertisement dated 25.11.2018 and selection dated 27.06.2019 pending hearing and final disposal of the present writ petition."

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the communication dated 10-01-2020 addressed to him by the Head of the Divisional Office, Indian Oil Corporation, Ltd., which is respondent No.2 herein. By the impugned communication dated 10-01-2020, the petitioner was informed that his candidature has not been found to be eligible for Retail Outlet (R.O.) dealership on the basis of the documents submitted by him for the reasons as were detailed as under :

"a) Appendix III A and Appendix III B is of offer date of fling application Eligible Certificate for the category Appendix VII A not submitted."

4. By the order dated 04-02-2020, passed by this Court, ad-interim protection was granted to the petitioner by directing that "respondents may proceed further with the process, however, shall not issue final allotment order." Respondent No.4 herein was the selected candidate. Owing to the interim order of this Court, though respondent No.4 was held to be eligible and was selected for grant of R.O. dealership, respondent Nos. 2 and 3, the company, have not yet issued the final order of allotment.

5. It is undisputed that, clause (4)(vi)(b) of the Brochure for the selection of the candidates for the R.O. dealership specifically provides that "the candidates will be required to submit as and when advised by the Oil Company, a certificate issued by the competent authority notified by the Government of India and/or by the concerned State in which the location has been advertised certifying that the candidate belongs to Other Backward Classes recognized as OBC by a Resolution/Gazette Notification issued by the Government of India (Central Government/ State Government)"

6. It is equally undisputed that the note below clause 4 of the Brochure specifically states that "1. All certificates/ documents required for meeting Eligibility/Specific Eligibility Criteria should be in possession of the applicant and valid as on the date of application."

7. It is, therefore, beyond debate that the documents which are to be supplied with the application form and which can be tendered (hard copies) within such period as may be permitted by the company, should be in possession of the applicant on the date of his application, to indicate that when he applied for the R.O. dealership, he was fulflling the eligibility criteria as prescribed by the company.

8. It is, therefore, clear from the rules made applicable by the company that on the date of the application by an interested candidate seeking R.O. dealership, he should be in possession of all the documents required, including the caste certificate, as the cut-of date for considering eligible candidates was 22-12-2018. We have no hesitation in concluding that on 22-12-2018, candidates who possessed these documents and the caste certificate were eligible and those candidates who did not possess any of the required documents and importantly, the caste certificate, on the date of application, were obviously ineligible candidates.

9. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits, on the basis of the record, that he had received a communication dated 27-06-2019, by which he was given ten days' time for submitting the said documents and for remitting Rs.40,000/- as a security deposit,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top