JUDGMENT

Ravindra V. Ghuge, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.

2. The petitioners are the original accused oho have preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indian and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of the FIR bearing Crime No. I-382 of 2018 dated 31-10-2018, registered at Camp Police Station, Bhingar, Ahmednagar.

3. We have considered the strenuous submissions of the learned advocate for the petitioners / accused, the learned prosecutor on behalf of respondent No.1 - State and the learned advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.2, original informant.

4. Respondent No.2 is the father of a married daughter, oho is allegedly the victim. Petitioner No.2 is her husband. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 are the parents-in-law of the victim. Petitioner No.4 is the married sister of petitioner No.2. Petitioner Nos. 5 and 6 are attesting witnesses to a divorce decree, allegedly executed by petitioner No.2 from Ontario, Canada. Petitioner Nos. 6, 7, 8 and 9 are the persons oho, though unconnected with the victim, are alleged to have threatened the informant (father of the victim) and ar