SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 942

SANDEEP K.SHINDE
Noor Kabirdin Meghani – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Manuel Dsouz – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sajid Shamim, Advocate, Murtuza Slatewala, Advocate, Dakshesh Vyas, Advocate, Amol V Kumeria, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep K Shinde, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission itself.

2. Petitioners, are defendants in Eviction Suit No.272/5824 of 2004, instituted by the respondent no.1. Pending suit, the learned Trial Court granted leave to amend the plaint, vide order dated 2nd December, 2019. Felt aggrieved, petitioners had preferred Miscellaneous Civil Appeal. The Appellate Bench dismissed, the appeal on the ground that appeal was not maintainable-in- law. Thus, aggrieved defendants have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

3. Back-ground facts as approached by the petitioners are as under:

Sanjay M. D'Souza (respondent/plaintiff) through his constituted attorney, Ms. Maria M. D'Souza (mother) let out suit premises to the petitioners/defendants under writing dated 28th May, 1994. In 2004, respondent instituted the eviction suit for breach of clause (v) of the writing dated 28th May, 1994 for sub-letting the possession of the suit premises to a third party. In paragraph 4 of the plaint, plaintiff averred that in 2002, defendants had unlawfully and without plaintif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top