JUDGMENT

Manish Pitale, J. - By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order of detention dated 21.08.2020 passed by the respondent No.1 i.e. Commissioner of Police, Nashik City under section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred as "the MPDA Act") whereby petitioner has been detained. The order of detention and the grounds of detention along with relied upon material were served upon the petitioner.

2. Although number of grounds have been raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has pressed grounds (c), (h), (i) and (f) in order to challenge the aforesaid detention order. Ground (c) pertains to improper recording of subjective satisfaction about truthfulness of in camera statements. Grounds (h) and (i) pertain to wrong translation of relied upon documents and ground (f) pertains to alleged non-application of mind by the respondent No.1 - detaining authority while issuing the detention order.

3. M