SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 899

ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
Lalita – Appellant
Versus
Laxmansingh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.R. Agrawal, Advocate, D.N. Kukday, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anuja Prabhudessai, J. - Heard finally with consent at the stage of admission.

2. The Appellant herein has challenged the judgment and award, dated 08/10/2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Achalpur (hereinafter shall be referred to as the 'Tribunal' for short) in M.A.C.P. No.54/2007. By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has dismissed the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter shall be referred to as the 'Act' for short) on the ground that the Claimant has failed to prove the issue of negligence.

3. The Appellant hereinafter shall be referred to as the 'Claimant'. The Claimant is the widow of one Rajkumar Sawalkar, who died in a motor vehicular accident on 09/03/2007, near the farm of Hiralal Kasdekar, on Kusumkot-Dharni Road. It is the case of the Claimant that the deceased was pillion rider on a motorcycle bearing Registration No.MP-04-AF-1537, which was driven by one Sanjay Marko. The Claimant had stated that one unknown vehicle dashed against the motorcycle resulting in death of the rider as well as the pillion ri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top