SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 876

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.J. Kathawalla, Vinay Joshi, JJ.
Atmaram Dnyaneshwar Fokane - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 3615 of 2020
Decided On : 10-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sachin Gite, for the Appellant / Ms. S. D. Vyas, B Panel Counsel, for the Respondent.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the vacant post of Sarpanch, as per the amended second proviso to Section 43 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, must be filled by election from amongst the members of the panchayat themselves within thirty days from the date of such vacancy.

Headnote:

Sarpanch Appointment - Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Section 43, Section 30-1A, Amendment Act, 2020 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 43 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, which provides a mechanism for filling up vacancies for the post of Sarpanch or Up-Sarpanch. The amended second proviso to Section 43 introduced by the Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Amendment) Act, 2020, stipulates that the vacant post of directly elected Sarpanch shall be filled by election from amongst the members of the panchayat themselves within thirty days from the date of such vacancy. The court emphasized that the statutory mandate completely bars the automatic appointment of a candidate to the vacant post of Sarpanch and requires the post to be filled through an election.

Fact of the Case:

The Petitioner sought direct appointment to the post of Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat- Ghoti (Kh), Taluka- Igatpuri, district Nashik, following the disqualification of the incumbent Sarpanch. The State contended that the post of Sarpanch is to be filled by way of an election from amongst the members of the panchayat, and as the Petitioner was not a member of the Panchayat, he cannot be declared as the Sarpanch.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the statutory requirement for filling the vacant post of Sarpanch is through an election from amongst the members of the panchayat, as per the amended second proviso to Section 43 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The Petitioner's claim of automatic appointment to the vacant post of Sarpanch without election was deemed unsustainable.

Issues: The main issue was whether another candidate could be directly appointed to the post of Sarpanch without an election, following the disqualification of the incumbent Sarpanch.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amended second proviso to Section 43 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act mandates the vacant post of directly elected Sarpanch to be filled by election from amongst the members of the panchayat themselves within thirty days from the date of such vacancy. The Petitioner's claim of automatic appointment to the vacant post of Sarpanch without election was against the statutory requirement.

Final Decision: The Petition was deemed devoid of merits and was dismissed. The court discharged the rule accordingly.

JUDGMENT

Vinay Joshi, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. By this Writ Petition, the Petitioner is seeking direct appointment to the post of Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat- Ghoti (Kh), Taluka- Igatpuri, district Nashik. It is the Petitioner's case that due to the disqualification of the Sarpanch (Smt. Kokane) the post of Sarpanch became vacant hence he be appointed to the said post.

3. The facts of the Petition can be narrated in brief that the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat- Ghoti (Kh) was reserved for the Other Backward Class ("OBC") category from the year 2019 to 2024. The Petitioner belongs to the Hindu Kunbi caste, which is recognised as OBC. Smt. Kokane (disqualified Sarpanch) also claimed to belong to the Kunbi caste i.e. of the OBC category. The Petitioner as well as Smt. Kokane contested the election for the post of Sarpanch of village Ghoti (Kh), which was held on 26th June, 2019. The Petitioner lost the election, whilst Smt. Kokane got elected for the post of Sarpanch, reserved for the OBC category.

4. At the time of the election, Smt. Kokane had not submitted her caste validity certificate. However, she gave an undertaking that she would submit her caste validity certificate within a period of one year from the declaration of the election result. Smt.Kokane approached the Caste Scrutiny Committee for the issuance of the caste validity certificate. According to the Petitioner, Smt. Kokane does not belong to the OBC category, hence he raised an objection before the Scrutiny Committee for the issuance of the caste validity certificate in favour of Smt. Kokane.

5. The Caste Scrutiny Committee, after holding an inquiry has rejected the caste claim of Smt. Kokane for the OBC category, vide its Order dated 25th June, 2020. Consequently, the Caste Scrutiny Committee cancelled the caste certificate of Smt. Kokane for the OBC category. Being aggrieved by the said decision, Smt. Kokane filed Writ Petition (St.) No. 5573 of 2020 challenging the rejection of her caste claim. This Court vide its Order dated 27th October, 2020 dismissed the Petition and confirmed the decision of the Caste Scrutiny Committee in rejecting the caste claim of Smt. Kokane.

6. Consequent to the Order dated 25th June, 2020 passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee, the Collector, Nashik in terms of Section 30-1A of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 (for short the "Act") vide Order dated 14th July, 2020 had disqualified Smt.Kokane from the post of Sarpanch. The Petitioner states that he was the only other candidate from the OBC category, who contested the election for the post of Sarpanch. According to the Petitioner, as the post of Sarpanch fell vacant due to disqualification of Smt. Kokane, he should be appointed as the Sarpanch.

7. The State resisted the Petition vide Affidavit in Reply dated 8th February, 2021. So far as the factual aspect is concerned, there was no dispute about the disqualification of Smt. Kokane for the post of Sarpanch. It is not denied that the Petitioner also belongs to the OBC category and was the only other candidate, contesting the election of Sarpanch from the OBC category. Moreover, it is not in dispute that due to the disqualification of Smt. Kokane, the post of Sarpanch of village Ghoti (Kh) fell vacant. However, the State resisted the Petition by contending that in terms of amended second proviso to Section 43 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, the post of Sarpanch is to be filled by way of an election from amongst the members of the panchayat. Hence, the State contended that as the Petitioner was not a member of the Panchayat, he cannot be declared as the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat.

8. In view of that, the limited controversy arose as to whether upon the post of Sarpanch falling vacant due to disqualification, another candidate could be directly appointed without election. The answer can be certainly in the negative, simply for the reason that the relev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top