SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 876

S.J.KATHAWALLA, VINAY JOSHI
Atmaram Dnyaneshwar Fokane – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sachin Gite, for the Appellant / Ms. S. D. Vyas, B Panel Counsel, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Vinay Joshi, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. By this Writ Petition, the Petitioner is seeking direct appointment to the post of Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat- Ghoti (Kh), Taluka- Igatpuri, district Nashik. It is the Petitioner's case that due to the disqualification of the Sarpanch (Smt. Kokane) the post of Sarpanch became vacant hence he be appointed to the said post.

3. The facts of the Petition can be narrated in brief that the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat- Ghoti (Kh) was reserved for the Other Backward Class ("OBC") category from the year 2019 to 2024. The Petitioner belongs to the Hindu Kunbi caste, which is recognised as OBC. Smt. Kokane (disqualified Sarpanch) also claimed to belong to the Kunbi caste i.e. of the OBC category. The Petitioner as well as Smt. Kokane contested the election for the post of Sarpanch of village Ghoti (Kh), which was held on 26th June, 2019. The Petitioner lost the election, whilst Smt. Kokane got elected for the post of Sarpanch, reserved for the OBC category.

4. At the time of the election, Smt. Kokane had not submitted her caste validity certificate. However, she gave an undertak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top