SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 869

PRITHVIRAJ K.CHAVAN
Sharmilee Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Kiran Bharekar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ojas Deolankar, Advocate, Rohit Lanke, Advocate, Rajesh A More, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Prithviraj K Chavan, J. - Feeling aggrieved with rejection of an application-Exhibit 5 in Regular Civil Suit No.01 of 2019 for temporary injunction by the Ad-hoc District Judge-6, Pune on 19th July, 2019, the appellant has preferred this appeal under Order- XLIII, Rule-1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'C.P.C').

2. Facts germane for disposal of the appeal can be summarized as follows;

Appellant No.1 is a registered proprietor and owner of the trademark "atmantan-be transformed". Appellant No.1 has given exclusive right to use the said trademark to appellant No.2 since 2009. Appellant No.2 is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. Appellant No.2 is running a Luxury Wellness Destination in Mulshi, near Pune in the name and style as "atmantan be transformed". It deals in human health, hygiene, beauty care and hospitality. The appellants state that they have been providing health, medical, spa services, hygienic and beauty care since long time. They are well known for their high degree of professional management at every level and quality of unmatched services.

3. It is the contention of the appellants that as it's trade name itself suggests tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top