SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 844

K.R.SHRIRAM
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Rita Ankush Indrekar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.N. Dabholkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

K.R.Shriram, J. - This is an appeal impugning an order and judgment dated 3rd May 2006 passed by Learned Special Judge, Pune acquitting respondent (accused) of offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

2. The charged Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of NDPS Act read as under:-

"20. Punishment for contravention in relation to cannabis plant and cannabis - whoever, in contravention of any provision of this Act or any rule or order made or condition of licence granted thereunder:-

(a) .............

(b) produces, manufactures, possesses, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter-State or uses cannabis, shall be punishable -

(i) .............

(ii) Where such contravention relates to sub-clause (b), -

(A) and involves small quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to (one year), or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees, or with both;

(B)............. (C)............."

Small quantity is defined under Section 2(xxiiia) and it reads as under:

"2(xxiiia) "small quantity" in relation to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, means any quantity lesser than the quantity

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top