SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 820

ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
Sangita Sudhakar Turke – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Co Ltd – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.O. Ahmed, Advocate, D.N. Kukday, Advocate, P.P. Nagpure, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anuja Prabhudessai, J. - The Appellants herein have challenged the judgment dated 20/01/2018 in M.A.C.P. No. 64 of 2014. Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal the Appellants who are the Claimants in the M.A.C.P. No.64 of 2014 have filed appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (for short 'the M.V. Act').

2. The Appellants shall be hereinafter referred to as the Claimants and the Respondent shall be referred to as 'Insurance Company'.

3. Heard learned Counsel for the Appellants-Claimants and learned Counsel for the Respondent-Insurance Company. ADMIT.

4. The Claimants are the legal representatives of deceased Sudhakar Turke who expired in a motor vehicular accident on 22/04/2014 involving Tipper truck bearing registration No. MH-34-AB- 1406. It was the case of the Claimants that the accident was caused due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of the Tipper truck. The Claimants stated that the deceased was 30 years of age and he was working at Ganesh Medical Stores, Rajura and earning monthly salary of Rs.6000/-. The Cla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top