SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 815

MANGESH S.PATIL
Ashok Kacharu Malve – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Atmaram J Patil, Advocate, P.G. Borade, Advocate, V.R. Dhorde, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mangesh S Patil, J. - Heard. Rule. The Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of both the sides the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.

2. Couple of accused from the Crime No.347/2019 registered with Shrirampur City Police Station, for the offence punishable under Section 406, 420, 465, 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code are before this Court invoking the powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur in Criminal MA.No.106/2020 on 09.07.2020 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge imposed further conditions for releasing them on bail, over and above what were imposed by the learned Magistrate while granting bail under Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. The learned advocate for the applicants would submit that the learned Magistrate for the reasons recorded in the order had directed the applicants to be released on bail subject to usual conditions. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied the original informant who represents his bank preferred a Revision under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top